Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

I would like to show you what will be published next week.

Smart diagnostics no longer require tuning, which can take 30-40 minutes. The entire profile creation process takes an average of 6 minutes.

Time-code

DIAGNOSTIC start
Creating PX HIGH
Creating PX MID
Creating PX LOW
Creating P2
Creating P1
All profiles filled
The difference between stock and tuning
DIAGNOSTIC smart step - no matter which automatic voltage you use, the CTR in the second step will move to the safe last step.

Files

CTR 2.1 RC3 - DEMO (key-features for Zen3)

DIAGNOSTIC start - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=13 Creating PX HIGH - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=77 Creating PX MID - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=112 Creating PX LOW - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=146 Creating P2 - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=165 Creating P1 - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=197 All profiles filled - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=287 The difference between stock and tuning - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=294 DIAGNOSTIC smart step - https://youtu.be/nFzPWJ1rOx8?t=348

Comments

Anonymous

Nice. Thank you

Anonymous

Nice ! Awesome ! Can't wait for this to be out !

Anonymous

Can't wait! You're doing some great work here and it's very much appreciated by all of us! (If I may say that)

Anonymous

Sincerely appreciate your contribution to this community. Looking forward to the new content!

Anonymous

An offtopic question, why dont you update Cinebench to R23? Can we replace it by hand in cinebench folder? Thanks for the new updates!

Gabriel

Sure hope not cause R23 wont run on my system and their support has not been able to figure out why. Plus R20 is faster :D Maybe give us both options.

Gabriel

This may be the one that solves my weird Px issue!!! :)

Henry Curtis Pelgrift

Awww, I kind of liked the long, more-involved diagnostic tuning. It felt like everything was reviewed with a fine-tooth comb. Unless that's what we were seeing again at the end. Is that still an option? It looked like the original diagnostic tests I mean. Neat that it's able to suggest settings for each profile based just on the cinebench runs. The new PX Profile settings also kind of remind me of DRAM Calculator. Plus, the safe at least means that if Fast causes a reboot, you've a more likely safe option you can set, which is comforting! Also, did I miss the part where it said what kind of sample your CPU is? Or did you just take that out so folks don't get jealous? :P I would hope that AMD sent you a well-binned Platinum Sample given how much you do for them...

Tom DePaolo

Going off the cb20 score in the first test it's an average to below avg sample.

Anonymous

Agreed, mine hits ccx1 4825 ccx2 4575, pbo2 will hit 5150 on 5 cores ccx1 1 core 5025, and the rest I've seen flicker 5000, if there was a way to hold the clocks longer like this improved rc3 I'll hopefully see emulators, and gaming fps increase, while also giving me a fantastic all core for premier pro & after affects. Excited. Only other note is fclk 2000 dark hero doesn't like ctr :/ trying to get them to work together can be annoying.

Tom DePaolo

Fclk @ 2000? I have a 5600 I can set the fclk over 2000. With PBO maxxed out it boosts to something like 5100mhz. To switch to CTR I had to cut back to 1800 Fclk, otherwise it would crash during diagnostic. Once I adjusted everything again I got a decent performance increase. I couldn't tell my fclk was costing me top speed stability and performance because it was like PBO was hiding it from me. That's the best way I can explain it. If anything tune it back down to 3800 and see what happens. How I see it, a 200mhz ram increase won't make an improvement worth any risk in stability. See if you get higher benchmark scores at different fclk speeds. Sometimes a RAM instability is hard to detect, then once you detect it and eliminate it you see a nice increase you never expected.