Home Artists Posts Import Register
Patreon importer is back online! Tell your friends ✅

Files

C - THOR - FULL LENGTH.mp4

Comments

Raga G

Fantastic reaction, as always! "Sir, you have a temper!" and "Take him, girl. What is your problem? Help him out. Help him and his hair out!" killed me :) A couple of corrections: The Destroyer (giant mechanical automaton) is Asgardian; it was not sent from Jotunheim and it wasn't one of Stark's inventions (that agent only suspected that it might be). More importantly, the smaller blue cube shown in the post-credits scene is called the Tesseract and is not at all related to the larger blue "casket" that was confiscated from the frost giants. They are both very similar shades of blue, so, this is a perfectly understandable and easy mistake to make on your first watch. I strongly agree with Martin above that you should not watch the upcoming Thor film prematurely as it would ruin your "first-time" experience. It's not just about knowing the facts (i.e., "bio") about characters you have not encountered yet, but the deep emotional growth that so many characters (including Thor himself) have experienced from previous films that you'll miss out on if you jump straight to the new one. This means watching not only all the Thor movies, but also the Avengers movies and the movies that are in turn necessary for enjoying them. I won't overwhelm you with the full order, but for now, we need to get you to your first Avengers film, for which, as Martin says, you must first watch "Iron Man 2 (2008)" and "Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)". Then you can watch "The Avengers (2012)", so you'll be ready for the next Thor movie that you're so eager to get into! (Since we're sticking to the bare minimum, I'd say that "The Incredible Hulk (2008)", which was released earlier, is optional.) Given what you've already seen so far, the one and only fully stand-alone pair of films that I feel comfortable recommending to you to watch at any time with no prerequisites, are "Guardians of the Galaxy (2014)" and its sequel "Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2017)". There are two other films that might be considered to be stand-alone films, namely "Ant-Man (2015)" and "Captain Marvel (2019)". It's not the end of the world if you see either of them right away (i.e., at worst a mild misdemeanor but nothing like a felony, you know), but for the best experience, wait until at least after you've seen "Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)" before seeing Ant Man and wait until at least after you've seen "The Avengers (2012)" and "Guardians of the Galaxy (2014)" before you see Captain Marvel. If you get requests for any other MCU movies at this time, of course, it's up to you at the end of the day, but if the terms and conditions allow for it, my recommendation would be to wait until you finish "The Avengers (2012)" (and then some, depending on the movie in question).

Martin

I agree with everything Raga said here, The Incredible Hulk (2008) is very optional and I wouldn't include it personally, as The Avengers presents it's own iteration of the character (different actor & take that is carried forward in the future Marvel movies) and is much better demonstrated in The Avengers.

ambiture

fun fact, this was directed by none other than gilderoy lockhart himself!!