Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Live Sex ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

The Incredible Hulk (2008) | Full Length Reaction! (Patreon)

Published:
2021-11-12 02:04:20
Imported:
2021-12

Content

So I just watched The Incredible Hulk!! I was a bit shocked to see Edward Norton as the hulk in this film and would like to know why they didn't stick with him? I love Mark Ruffalo and I want to see him as the hulk, I'm just curious. 🙂  But I felt this film did a really good job introducing Bruce Banner as a character, how he came to be the Hulk and his personality overall. Also the fact that they paid homage to the old hulk with the references; the purple pants, Lou Ferrigno, etc. It was a lot of fun and I hope you guys enjoy as well!!

Files

The Incredible Hulk (2008)

Comments

Flukemarm

Edward Norton is notoriously difficult to work with, nothing bad apparently he is just obsessed with controlling his characters. And with the start of the actual MCU they were going for more of a group focus instead of having singular intense actors. In the words of Kevin Feige, “an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members.”

TJ Bigelow

The first Hulk movie had Eric Bana as Bruce Banner. Its not really part of the MCU and isn't good anyway. But finding a reliable Hulk was difficult until Mark signed on. If you're gonna watch all the MCU, it wouldn't hurt to see the 1986 film Howard the Duck, too lol. He comes up, very briefly, in 3 films and in the What If series.

Flukemarm
>>71654901

"This only happened after Universal failed to get a sequel to Ang Lee's 2003 Hulk movie in active development by the contracted date (at which point the rights would revert to Marvel). David Maisel, a former Marvel Studios executive who played a key role in getting the MCU up and going, subsequently proposed that Marvel Studios make the next Hulk film and pay Universal to distribute it, which resulted in 2008's The Incredible Hulk. This also ensured that Marvel Studios could use Hulk in "future multicharacter films," beginning with The Avengers in 2012). At the same time, Universal retains "the right of first refusal to distribute any future solo Hulk movies," which accounts for the lack of a second Hulk solo movie in the MCU."

MotoDork
>>71655803

No, there’s zero reason for her, or anyone, to watch Howard the Duck. Even George Lucas hates Howard the Duck.

Jayson Phillips

Can't wait to see the next two with you as well

Tom Evans

I'm a fan of a lot of Ed Norton movies - Rounders, Fight Club, American History X... but once Mark Ruffalo takes over the role I can't see Hulk any other way.

David Crabtree

Love this movie! It's a shame Edward Norton didn't continue in this roll.

Richard Ryan

Something that not a lot of people realize immediately is that "Mr. Blue" (Dr. Sterns) was actually set up to become a villain from the comics called The Leader (human name also Sterns). The Leader hasn't been used yet, so far as I can tell, but we did see Mr. Blue's head swelling and pulsing....

Richard Maurer

"a strong year for the MCU" lol, you ain't seen nothin' yet.

MenuMitch

Great reaction Vicky, I'm quite excited for the rest of phase 1!

Alan Kobb

You can Google the question of why Ruffalo replaced Norton, and if you read 10 articles you'll get 10 versions of the story. Suffice it to say, Norton has said some bad things about this movie, and Marvel had some bad things to say about him. They apparrently negotiated to include him in The Avengers, but eventually went to Ruffalo. So, bad blood all around.

Thomas Yanez

About the military-ness of the first two movies. One way of looking at it is this : superheroes represent power. Governments (and hence the military) don't like unchecked powerful entities. They will always seek to control them, or failing that, mitigate and/or destroy them.

James M

"I'm pretty sure Tony Stark is going to be one of my favorite characters" hehehe

vlocke67

great reaction as always. Vee, you are allowed to love both DC and Marvel! There's no conflict there! your love can coexist

Chris Lüders

Well, not my favorite MCU Film, but a good one. 😉

LightsCameraJake

For context as to why Tony knows about building a team/ The Avengers in this movie. In Iron man 1 end credits They mentioned building the Avengers in the end credits scen when Samuel L Jackson shows up to tell Tony he is putting a program together called "The Avengers Initiative" and now Tony relayed that info to the General at the end of Hulk. Its amazing how all these movies tie in to one another.

Bryan Tuck

You've probably heard this a million times by now, but make sure you watch the mid- and post-credits scenes. You seem to have missed Iron Man's. :) Incredible Hulk's is right before the credits, but most of the other movies have them in the middle or at the very end (and often both). And they become more and more significant as they go.

Matt

It's very refreshing to see reactions to these movies without any true prior knowledge! Loved hearing you wonder about Betty specifically. One issue I had with this story was the assumption that viewers would know a bit about the history between the character from the old hulk movie and/or comics. Some flashbacks to the old hulk movie were thrown into the intro credits but unfortunately that's about all the context they really provide. Also, I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on some of the upcoming films in the series!

Inhuman Paradox
>>71877732

That was actually due to Universal's editors wanting to distance this film from Hulk 2003 in editing against the director's wishes. I really wish MCU fans would start a Snyder Cut movement for this film, Leterrier and Norton really made some great stuff that was left out of the final cut, as well as the original cut having a better non-linear pace with breathing room.

Inhuman Paradox
>>71661833

I'm the complete opposite. Norton was far more comic accurate. Ruffalo feels more generic, and I dislike how comedic they made the Hulk. The Hulk is meant to be the manifestation of everything Bruce oppresses. It's not a separate personality created by the experiment, it's all the anger and trauma that was ALWAYS within Bruce, but the experiment made it manifest as a monster. A literal inner demon, something to be terrified of. There's nothing scary about Ruffalo's Hulk, even the voice is Ruffalo's friendly voice whereas this film had the Legend Himself Lou Ferrigno with his demonic roars. The Hulk is a Jeckyl and Hyde story, but I never got that from Ruffalo, only Norton. It's a sad consequence of the MCU's allergy to darker tones. It's why material like Jessica Jones doesn't exist in the films, the MCU movies are action comedies first and foremost. And that just isn't conducive to characters like Ghost Rider, Hulk, Daredevil, etc etc.. Even Eternals was a huge risk, and look how that's working out (Critics hating it because how dare an MCU film try to be more than the formula). That's the nail in the coffin for any chance of the MCU going darker on the big screen.

Inhuman Paradox
>>71691950

Norton has said some bad things about this "cut" of the film, not the film itself. This final cut was butchered almost to the same extent as Suicide Squad or Daredevil. I wish MCU fans would gather for a Snyder Cut movement for this film.