Home Artists Posts Import Register

Poll

Celestine 3.0 Sketch Comparison

  • 3.0 looks good, proceed to phase 2 24
  • Original looks better start over 0
  • Original is perfect no need to redraw 2
  • 2020-01-02
  • —2020-01-16
  • 26 votes
{'title': 'Celestine 3.0 Sketch Comparison', 'choices': [{'text': '3.0 looks good, proceed to phase 2', 'votes': 24}, {'text': 'Original looks better start over', 'votes': 0}, {'text': 'Original is perfect no need to redraw', 'votes': 2}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2020, 1, 16, 2, 54, 9, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2020, 1, 2, 2, 54, 33, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allows_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 26}

Content

Did a 3,0 sketch for Celestine and want to ask if its worthy...

...Compared to the Original


Comments

Arcel U. A. Wolfe

a better improvement. leg, feet, and whatever she's wearing as sandals are drawn better in 3.0, hands and cloth is more detailed and I like how the eyes are drawn on 3.0.

Anonymous

owo fav girl. But being serious, this is a massive improvement over the older sketches/drawings. With the Original sketches I couldn't ... quite put my finger on it as to why it just felt wrong but now? I don't have that gut feeling anymore in comparison and this is only just the sketches. Heh, this is making me think about re-commissioning the re-commission, just to see how far you have gone (and show how much progress you have seen as you can do a side-by-side(-by-side) comparison.)