Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

前民政事務局局長王永平宣佈封筆,寫完最後一篇《AM730》專欄後,正式和香港人道別。一年前,《港區國安法》剛生效時,他就宣佈關閉Facebook專頁,「以免讀者資料被當局查閱」;當時不少人覺得他過敏,現在看來,自然是他知道「某些單位」的運作模式,保護自己、保護別人,也是先見之明。

認識王永平,源自他離開政府後,走到中文大學政政系任教,身份是客席教授,因此最初我是客氣的稱呼他「王教授」,然後熟絡了就叫「平叔」。他又高官轉型為「KOL」,令不少官場中人大感意外:他為官時,無論公眾形象、還是內部作風,都和林瑞麟相差不遠,彷如一部人肉錄音機,想不到他退休後判若兩人。而且他是真心喜愛教學、喜愛寫文章,有時見面,他會集中討論某篇文,說「以文會友」,可以說,他是一個被AO生涯耽誤了的老文青。

他很知道自己的社會角色,因為就算是十年前,也不會有一位當過局長的高官退休後成為「時事評論員」,而且還是對政府持明顯批評態度。他的舊同事本來都以陰謀論視之,認為他「唔知搏乜」,以為他要選議員,又或加入了某個財團的馬房,但日子有功,現在真相大白,這位任內以謹慎保守著稱的退休老人,居然真的是一個還有幾分傻勁的公共知識份子。

過去十年,有好幾次和社會事務有關的公民社會工作,請他幫忙,都是一口答應,但公眾真的知道他膽色的一刻,自然還是2019年的事。當時有新公務員工會舉行集會,反對《逃犯條例》,之前已經有AO、EO匿名聯署,而出席集會的人數雖然非常多,但大家都擔心秋後算賬。集會高潮,就是作為昔日大老闆的王永平線上台上,高呼「你地無做錯」,「因為公務員守則係我寫既,我最有資格咁講」,他一生人的highlight,肯定定格在那一刻。在場朋友事後說:「型到核爆」。

平叔不會天真地以為這次站台沒有後果。事後,政府對他點名批評,並說他當時制訂的條例是被「今日的KOL/政棍」刻意曲解,重申公務員不可以表露政治立場之餘,《文匯》《大公》也對平叔連番口誅筆伐。他也大概心中有數,他一生人對香港社會的最大貢獻,已經完成,此後雖然他一直支持運動,但逐漸低調。記得曾和他詳談過,他的大意是:現在公務員內部的有生力量,只能盡力保住元氣,這是防守的時候;到了國安法通過,他似是第一天就部署了淡出,說「寫到無得寫為止」。現在才擱筆,反映社會空間確實寫與不寫,已經沒有分別了。

平叔的轉型,與及作為Yellow Submarine的「浮面」,都是很典型的香港故事:到了良心的底線,還是會發聲表態,而且「出櫃」之後,就一發不可收拾,幾乎每一個行為都是利他的,這和當公務員的前半生幾乎全然相反。是甚麼促使他有這樣的改變?相信真正的原因,明就明,根本唔使問,但係唔明點講都唔明,或者扮唔明。

希望平叔封筆後能繼續活出自在人生,盼望能在地球某處,繼續笑傲江湖。

Files

Comments

Wendy Lam

平叔都封筆了!😣 仲記得佢前年出席公務員個集會,為佢哋打氣!😥 好感謝平叔!🙏❤️

Dennis Ng

“幾乎每一個行為都是利他的,這和當公務員的前半生幾乎全然相反。” bad analysis. Fundamentally bad. Fundamentally before certain time, many civil servants can compare what they have done vs what other chinese civil servants in Taiwan and mainland china or even macau has done. It is the system that is beneficial. The citizens agreed to that. It is not individual servants but the system. Hence, you work in the system. It is the way. AO whatever even police has not played a bad role for quite a while. You have not live through the 1960s or earlier you do not know or sense it. The system works. Imperfect but works. And give the citizen liberty and protection. However after certain time in system has problem. That is the bad thing about like academic freedom with CE on the top. The … no democracy ultimately no liberty. It is not the fault of the civil servants by and large. Another even worst is that pure and all wording. No one or system is perfect. Any 墨子all for others is really bad. It is inhuman. We rely upon or chase after imperfect system to be democracy, imperfect media under liberty (I hate Apple daily not because what it is but no competition and hk people love tabloid … but imperfect). Uncle ping commentary is boring. Whilst he shined in that meeting let us not cheer one guy. We need all of imperfect us now, in the dark grey or light. Let us not use a wrong yardstick and also do not challenge pls history. As said by my police classmate do not call us 差人, we are police officer. Which I oblige. At that time they are. Let us call what human as human and dog as dog. But not to confuse. And even British or USA has bad and good civil servants. You have been right in the uk football correction post. I hope you can continue that line. Imperfect and self correction. 順祝筆安!

Annisa Tong

難得嘅風骨,真係一個有血有肉嘅香港人

Jackie Hui

請受小弟一拜🙇🏿‍♂️