Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

整合各會員的意見後,整合帖文將使用以下方法:

1. 每日整合Post會附上當日聲軌合集 (Patreon Audio Post)

2. 各片附有聲音連結供收聽及下載

3. 每月設有一自動更新的RSS連結,供其他平台收聽及下載

英國大選結果分析|看似工黨大勝,實為政局更多元分裂。法拉奇領改革黨得逾400萬票成第三多;左翼不滿工黨轉右,脫黨者獨立當選;加沙單一議題當選 (沈旭暉 X 馮智政) 00:00:00:00-00:58:37:17

影片連結:https://youtu.be/tAq3tptgmtc

聲音連結:https://open.acast.com/public/streams/668299becbd71a01fe11fea4/episodes/66893910fc882c395b3ddc86.mp3

經濟佬看世界| 美國經濟與誰是總統無關?16位諾貝爾經濟學獎得主聯署警告特朗普當選加劇通脹 (羅家聰博士、CalvinChoy、馮智政) 00:58:37:17-01:52:48:04

影片連結:https://youtu.be/zTPVaIZ6QW4

聲音連結:https://open.acast.com/public/streams/668299becbd71a01fe11fea4/episodes/66893912f5f883ab768629b3.mp3

【會員獨家影片:Simon 會客室・海外香港 339 🇬🇧】 英國香港人書店「同呼吸」店長:香港牆內買不到的書,就讓我們負責吧 01:52:48:04-02:18:11:11

英國諾定咸 (Nottingham) 的華文書店「同呼吸」由移英港人創辦,除了有各種各樣香港、中國主題社科和人文書籍售賣,也不時舉行講座,成了海外中文書店一股清流。不少朋友擔心同呼吸能否長期維持下去,但店長對在海外搜羅「新香港」再也買不到的書籍充滿熱誠,認為這是革命時代的時代使命。究竟他們的經營理念如何,又可以如何打破「越來越少人買書讀書」的定律?

影片連結:https://www.patreon.com/posts/hui-yuan-du-jia-106914108

聲音連結:https://open.acast.com/public/streams/668299becbd71a01fe11fea4/episodes/66893914453c109b96e0d8fd.mp3

哲學20分・陶國璋 016|電車難題,道德兩難最著名的詭論,道德標準如何判定? feat 黃沐恩博士 02:18:11:11-02:44:21:21

電車難題是倫理學中的一個思想實驗,描述了一個失控的電車將撞向五個人。你站在旁邊的岔道口,可以拉動拉桿,使電車改道撞向另一條軌道上的一個人。你會怎麼做?這個問題看似簡單,但卻隱含了深刻的哲學問題。在犧牲一個人來拯救五個人的情況下,我們應該如何做出道德判斷?在本次節目中,陶國璋教授將與黃沐恩博士一起探討電車難題。他們將從不同的角度分析這個問題,並探討道德標準的判定依據。

影片連結:https://youtu.be/OrTqXq2M9Ek

聲音連結:https://open.acast.com/public/streams/668299becbd71a01fe11fea4/episodes/66893917f5f883ab76862a52.mp3

____________________________________________

七月 Simon Patreon RSS 連結:(適用於 Apple Podcast/Youtube Music 等應用程式)

https://feeds.acast.com/public/shows/668299becbd71a01fe11fea4

RSS 訂閱Podcast教學:

Andriod:https://youtube.com/shorts/UCN6xlkYhL0

IOS:https://youtube.com/shorts/w3ObmhnWPnU

Comments

Elaine Yip

謝謝分享~

George

The trolley problem has long been a thought-provoking ethical dilemma that has sparked profound contemplation on the nature of sacrifice and decision-making. This moral conundrum has galvanized discussions about whether the value of a decision can be solely defined by the quantity of lives sacrificed or saved. It could become more complicated if individuals close to us such as friends or family members take part in the scenario. This problem forces us to grapple with the complexities of weighing different factors and considering the broader implications of our choices. Specifically, it compels us to reflect on the moral responsibility we hold when faced with difficult decisions, urging us to explore how other considerations, such as intention, individual rights, and long-term consequences, should be taken into account. By delving into the depths of this ethical issue, we’re compelled to question the very essence of our moral compass and explore the intricacies of decision-making in complex scenarios. I look forward to more episodes in moral philosophy. A deeper understanding of this subject may guide us how to ride out the political storm where ethics has been blurred with absurdity, fallacies and social degeneration in this day and age.