Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

In today's episode, we look at some legal terms that our patrons asked us to define.  In a twist, however, the guys switch chairs and Andrew asks the questions while Thomas tries to offer legal definitions.  How did that work out?   Listen and find out!

We begin, however, with a listener question from Rachel Doty, who -- in keeping with this episode's theme -- asks us to define "Alford plea."

Then, based on a suggestion from patron Marie Kent, we ask Thomas to define as many legal terms as he can in half an hour.  We think this would make an awesome game show, so if any of our listeners are TV producers, please give us a call.

Next, we take a look at a listener who recommended a Facebook post from an immigration attorney, and the guys discuss the concept of "illegal" immigration.

Finally, we end with a brand new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam question #15 that asks whether eyewitness testimony can be tainted by viewing the suspect in police custody.  Remember that TTTBE issues a new question every Friday, followed by the answer on next Tuesday's show.  Don't forget to play along by following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and/or our Facebook Page and quoting the Tweet or Facebook Post that announces this episode along with your guess and reason(s)!

Recent Appearances:

None.  Have us on your podcast, radio or TV show, or interview us!

Show Notes & Links

  1. Check out Marie's podcast, My Book of Mormon, by clicking here.
  2. This is the Facebook post from immigration lawyer Lily Axelrod that we discuss during the show.
  3. The one section of the US Code that Andrew found that uses the term "illegal alien" is 8 USC § 1365(b), which is very different from the colloquial use of the term.

Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law

Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Andrew: you said that voir dire was a process used in jury selection. However in "My Cousin Vinny", the prosecutor uses voir dire to assess the suitability of an expert witness (specifically, whether the scrumptious Marisa Tomei is an expert on automobiles). So the term seems to be a bit wider than just jury selection.

law

Very good addendum. As a trial lawyer who often conducts voir dire of expert witnesses, I thought I'd spare you the additional legal geekery. I should have known someone would call me out on it :)

Anonymous

Fun episode! I'll never remember most of it, but...I know it's there if I need it. ---- TTTBE I'm also going with "D". I should think the victim could identify Big Bird if she wanted to. Her ID would be questioned in court and it would either stand up, or not. My 2nd choice is "A" just because the circumstances involved at the time of her ID make it questionable.