Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Live Sex ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

OA602: New Eastman Docs Set Stage for Jan 6 Hearings (Patreon)

Published:
2022-06-06 05:08:06
Imported:
2022-10

Downloads

Content

About a week ago, there was yet another smoking gun document trove delivered to us by the Jan. 6 Committee in relation to the Eastman trial. Andrew gives us the full breakdown, including a couple new insurrectionist characters we haven't yet been introduced to. All of this, plus the first primetime Jan 6. Committee hearing is this Thursday! Listen and be primed for what's coming.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I keep hearing that in order to prove that they actually were engaging in sedition/treason/a coup, it needs to be proven that they knew what they were doing was illegal. And they're trying to use the justification that "we honestly believed there was fraud and we were trying to prevent a coup." But can that actually hold up? Analogy: I enter a raffle to win a car, but my neighbor wins instead. I claim there was cheating, the raffle was rigged, that the car actually belongs to me. I go to court to try to get the car given to me, but the court says I have no evidence of cheating. This happens, say, in 60 different court cases. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that I actually won the raffle. I convince a whole bunch of my friends that the raffle was rigged. Then, I convince a whole bunch of my friends to create a diversion outside the building where they're going to be giving away the car, while I get some of my other friends on the raffle committee to ignore the rules of the raffle to give it to me. The friends outside get too roudy and cause property damage and hurt people, while my friends inside fail to get the committee to award the car to me. Under this scenario, it seems like it would be really hard for me to say that, despite losing in court 60 times, I had an honest belief that the car should have been mine. And even if I did, I that I had no idea that my friends would get violent or that I bore any responsibility for their violence. Especially since, if everything had gone my way, I would be walking away with a car that, according to all reasonable people, belonged to my neighbor.

Anonymous

I don’t see the answer to the last Bar Exam question. Are you going to post it?

law
>>85516420

eventually, it's on my laptop and got lost while I was at sea