Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Downloads

Content

In this first standalone episode of Opening Arguments, Andrew and Thomas continue their discussion of the 2000 U.S. Presidential election, resurrect long-dead jokes about "hanging chads," and explain the legal journey from a tiny county courthouse in Florida to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Ever wondered how legitimate Bush v. Gore was?  You'll find out as part 2 concludes.

Show Notes & Links

  1. The Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).
  2. Palm Beach County's insane "butterfly ballot," which resulted in thousands of extra votes for Pat Buchanan that were almost certainly intended for Al Gore.
  3. The American Political Science Review article referenced on the show which did a statistical analysis of the Buchanan "butterfly ballot" votes.
  4. Herron & Lewis's 2006 political science article showing that Nader cost Gore the election in Florida even assuming no recount.
  5. One example of an early media report stating that Bush would have won with limited recounts of the sort Gore was seeking from the Florida courts.
  6. More recent studies indicate that if the recount had been allowed to proceed, Gore would have won.

Files

Comments

No comments found for this post.