Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Not a lawyer, but none of the answers strike me as very good. I am going with A, he clearly wanted the dog back, but it doesn't say that he had the intention of STEALING the dog back. He knocked on the door which gives the impression that he wanted to speak to his ex-wife in order get the dog back. He opened the door but didn't take that dog or anything else. And I don't know if it actually matters but it doesn't say he even entered the house, just that when he opened the door the dog greeted him. Also, though it's not a letter of the law thing the Bar probably cares about but opening an unlocked door, petting a dog, then leaving doesn't strike me as something worthy of a burglary charge.

Anonymous

I think A. He did not enter the property, and he had no intention to remove anything that wasn’t his. He knocked, got no answer, and heard the dog barking: arguably he could have opened the door out of concern for his ex’s safety. You don’t have to be armed to commit burglary, I think that’s aggravated burglary, isn’t it? Anyway, what sort of monster keeps a dog that belonged to their ex *before they even met*? Enforce that Entitlement To Full Canine Property Ownership right now! #TellHimPaulette