Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

OA531: Pop-law! Nirvana Sued by the Nevermind Baby; and a #FreeBritney Update! (Patreon)

Published:
2021-10-04 06:57:09
Imported:
2022-10

Downloads

Content

Everyone's favorite Ace Associate, Morgan Stringer, is back for another rousing edition of Morgan's Pop-law! So many of you asked us about the Nirvana lawsuit, so we've got the full breakdown for you. And Jamie Spears is no longer the conservator over Britney! We are one step closer to hashtag freeing Britney!

Links: Nevermind That Nirvana Child Pornography Lawsuit, Attorneys Say, Elden v Nirvana, Inside Nirvana's 'Nevermind' Pool Party, 25 Years Later, Born To Swim?, Jamie Spears was removed from Britney Spears's conservatorship

Appearances

None. Invite us on!

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I sympathize with Ace Associate(c). I had such high hopes. But I can’t wait to watch next week with the Hogs!

Anonymous

Aaah I've been looking forward to this!! (And love hearing more Morgan ❤️) Thank you. I'm very glad you started with Britney, which is depressing AF the more I hear about it, and sounds like some kind of legalized slavery (very happy Britney is getting free, and hope it's drawn awareness to others who may have loved ones in that situation). Morgan mentioned the conservatorship law needs to be reformed - what would be involved with that? Is it done at the Supreme Court level? What's the path to restricting or better defining what is or isn't allowed in those arrangements, and how courts (or other entities?) can check the clear potenial for abuse? For the Nirvana lawsuit, great breakdown! one funny detail missed: apprently the baby invited Nirvana to his art show, and they declined. He's said in an interview it's about the money/compensation, too, so not sure how his lawyers are making some child pornography argument. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/spencer-elden-sues-nirvana-over-cover-image-2002468 "In that same interview, Elden discussed the negative aspects of the notoriety, too. When asked if the cover affected his relationships, he said, “Totally. Everyone thinks you’re making money from it. ... You’ll hook up with a hot chick, and then they figure out you’re not making any money from it and they’ll dump you."