Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Live Sex ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

LAM50: The Trial of the Chicago 7 (Patreon)

Published:
2021-05-15 02:44:13
Imported:
2022-10

Downloads

Content

with special guest Heath Enwright! In an effort to balance my vehement hatred of Aaron Sorkin, we brought on a Sorkin fan (who also happens to be hilarious!) to break down the "look at me, look at me, I'm soooo smart" that is: The Trial of the Chicago 7. On Netflix. Watch your vague noun modifiers, everyone!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I found my parents' copy of steal this book in their attic when I was 11 (1998). It was a big part me starting to think about politics, eventually leading me to be the first person in my family to go to college.

Anonymous
>>72567196

Hated this movie, thank you for putting so much about why I disliked this movie, and sorkin, into words

Anonymous

Hi, New patron here. Just listening to the episode now. Andrew said that binding and gagging a defendant was a sure way to a mistrial which makes sense. It seems such an outrageous thing to do (and in this case very racist as well of course). I came across a reference to US murderer Robert Peernock (a white man) recently and looked him up out of curiosity. On the Wikipedia entry about him it says that during the course of his trial his behaviour was frequently terrible (apparently at one point he assaulted the prosecutor and tried to strangle him!) and he was removed from the courtroom a number of times and ultimately the judge ordered him bound and gagged when in court. It doesn't say if this was an issue on appeal in the wiki entry and just notes that he was convicted and sentenced to life. I was wondering if there are any circumstances where binding and gagging a defendant is appropriate and if this is one? Also, what is the best way to deal with an unruly/violent defendant to ensure safety and court order but not violate their rights?