Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

Remember sniveling weasel Brett Kavanaugh and the serious allegations against him by Dr. Ford and how he was "cleared" by an FBI investigation into the matter? Well according to Sheldon Whitehouse, that investigation might have been not just inadequate but perhaps FAKE.
In our main story, Andrew breaks down the Ohio lawsuit attempting to block the American Rescue Plan. It involves a deep dive into anti-commandeering doctrine, which might not be what you think it is.

Links: FBI facing allegation that its 2018 background check of Brett Kavanaugh was ‘fake’, Whitehouse Releases Letter to Garland on Oversight Matters, OLC Politicization, Ohio attorney general sues Biden administration over $1.9 trillion stimulus

Appearances

None, invite us on your show!

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

DakkaDakkaWAAGH

Hi, guys, I've a question for you based on a recent case here in Oz. If the Judge in a historic civil proceeding was belatedly found to be corrupt and having acted corruptly in favour of the winning party in that case, could the losing party sue to win back any penalties and fees lost in the original case? And if so, who would they sue?

Anonymous

In chambers opinions were a way for the Supreme Court to deal with what is now referred to as the “Shadow Docket.” Those opinions were individual justices writing about why they were granting or denying emergency motions arising from the circuits they supervised. This practice has largely gone away—the last one came from the Chief Justice in a 2013 case called King. The opinions are of dubious precedential value, but they do offer interesting opinions on traditional equity doctrines.