Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

T3BE 197 - Full Question Text for Patrons (Patreon)

Published:
2020-10-09 03:00:02
Imported:
2022-10

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I think you need to produce the original video and that a photo would only be admissible if the original is unavailable. The idea that the news station doesn't show the image anymore doesn't prove that it was distroyed. The person would need to subpoena the news station. If the station refused claiming the original was distroyed then the photo may be admissible. So A The justification is chain of evidence and credibility of evidence. The photo of a newscast is less trustworthy than the original recording

Anonymous

I am changing my mind 😂 I do think it is C for the same reasons above. The defendant denies the injuries were severe and the photo intends to prove that they were severe. But, it doesn’t prove negligence. Does the photo have to show that the defendant was negligent and the injuries were severe for it to be admissible? I think that may have tripped me up.

Anonymous
>>45577429

Well I completely wifted that one. For some reason I missed that the original was destroyed. I thought they just stopped showing it.