Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

Today's episode continues our discussion from Episode 366 on the political, criminal, and civil legal issues surrounding coronavirus and COVID-19 in the United States, including whether the CDC has the authority to waive the fees associated with testing for the virus (they do!) and how this is going to affect civil society (badly).  You won't want to miss it -- and you'll be stuck inside your house anyway, so you'll have all the time in the world to listen!

We begin, however, with some nuance regarding An Andrew Was Right, the line of Presidential succession, the 12th and 22nd Amendments, and whether Barack Obama can be Joe Biden's Vice-President.  Learn that... apparently there's an argument that he could?

After that, it's time for the main segment, which covers COVID-19 and the coronavirus, specifically (a) Rep. Katie Porter's amazing cross-examination of the CDC Director and the legal authority; (b) lawsuits against con artists like Jim Bakker and Alex Jones; (c) Congress's response; (d) more on private lawsuits and the specific example of SXSW; and (e) a really interesting question about jury duty and the future of jury trials.

After all that, it's time for a dreaded REAL PROPERTY #T3BE.  Can you get it right?  Just share out this episode on social media, include the hashtag #T3BE, your guess, and your reasons therefor and we will shower the winner with... well, you know.

Appearances

Andrew was just a guest speaker at Houston OASIS, and we’ll be working to bring you the audio of his speech from that event. And if you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. In the "A" segment on Presidential succession, we referenced this law review article from Peabody & Gant.
  2. Check out the video of Katie Porter's blistering cross-examination of the CDC Director as well as the text of 42 CFR § 71.30.
  3. And, of course, you'll want to listen to our original coverage back in Episode 366.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-Remember to check out our YouTube Channel  for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

RE: The Rapture and Survival Buckets: There are three main trains of thought among Evangelicals for what part of the Tribulation (the 7 years of the end times) the Rapture occurs during. 1 - Pre Tribulation: This school of thought is the most intuitive and is also the most popular because of the Left Behind series. Basically all True Christians (TM) get raptured before the Tribulation starts. 2 - Post Tribulation: This is the weirdest one: Christians don't get raptured till *after* the final battle of Armageddon at the very end of the Tribulation. People who believe in this one will need 7 years worth of survival buckets. This viewpoint is also the least popular. 3 - Pre-Wrath: Basically the Tribulation is broken up into two three and a half year segments. The first segment is world peace under the Antichrist, and the second half is the Wrath of God. Pre-Wrath Trib believes think Christians will be raptured right as the Wrath of God is kicking off. This belief is super popular among biblical literalists (there is a lot of text supporting it). Even though they get raptured before the Wrath of God, they will still need 3.5 years of Survival Buckets because the Antichrist will persecute Christians during the period of world peace I guess. So yeah. People who sell survival buckets really like to push #2 and #3. All three are mainstream evangelical beliefs, though #2 is a bit less popular ("omg why would god do that to christians").

law

Thanks!