Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Well, this was a disappointing end to Thomas's 7-question win streak, with an answer that made so sense to him (and likely not many of you, either).  Thomas picked (D), but the correct answer was, in fact, (B).  He's now 92-for-167 (55.1%).

Files

Comments

Anonymous

What might have been the "damages" sought by the owner if not abrogation of the contract itself? Did they just seek a reduction in cost? Seems like if the accident had impaired his mental abilities and he was unable to perform as well they would prevail on that basis. I am confused.

James from Québec wants Rand Paul to debate Jordan

This is the first Bar question that makes sense to me on hand (I'm from a civil law jurisdiction, so common law is odd). You should not be considered in breach of contract for things that come from no fault of your own. "Acts of god" are a general exemption to contracts here