Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Downloads

Content

Today's episode takes a deep dive into the latest bizarre lawsuit filed by perhaps America's most-despised Trump sycophant, California Rep. Devin Nunes.  Learn all about Nunes's thrice-disciplined lawyer and the theory so crazy it must be heard (and read) to be believed. 

We begin, however, with an incredibly insightful listener question regarding the bill of attainder doctrine and whether it would apply to the hypothetical Poke Ted Cruz Act of 2021 discussed during our latest live show.

Then, it's time to break down Devin Nunes's lawsuit piece by piece, in which you'll learn all about civil RICO lawsuits ... and why they don't remotely apply to the paranoid conspiracy theory connecting Robert Mueller to Fusion GPS to the Daily Caller to... the Center for Accountability?  It's a wild ride, so strap in!

After that, it's time for another listener question regarding the guys' views on policy debates vs. "scorched earth" during the Democratic primary.

And then, it's time to see if Thomas can turn around his recent losing streak with a #T3BE question involving an offer to sell a pickup truck, acceptance via mail, and revocation by phone.  Who wins?  Listen and find out!

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. In the opening segment, we discussed the bill of attainder doctrine explained in U.S. v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946).
  2. Oh man, you have to read the Devin Nunes lawsuit for yourself.
  3. Check out the new Larry Klayman's AVVO page detailing his prior suspensions.
  4. Civil RICO can be found at 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq
  5. In the last segment, we mention this atrocious hit piece in the Jacobin.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

The reason a document is likely to have an assortment of randomly different fonts and font sizes, as the Nunes one has, is because it has been compiled via copy-and-paste from a number of separate sources . . . and NOT reformatted! Mr. Bliss' legal secretary has probably died of old age. [A well-formatted document might, for instance, have a quote of more than three lines set off with smaller type and wider margins; I have also used plain type to transcribe the text of a certificate or deed and bold italic type to show the parts that were filled in by hand.]

Anonymous

There's a lawyer in New York named Jonny Kool.