Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Downloads

Content

Today's episode, sadly, reminds you of an entirely new way that you should be terrified.  In a "please, tell me that Donald Trump's lawyers aren't listening to this" episode, Andrew breaks down a 1990s court decision surrounding a 1920s law to talk about the ultimate endgame for Trump and the census.  Is it horrible?  Yes.  Are you better off being prepared?  Absolutely.

We begin, however, with a quick trip up a rare Tuesday Yodel Mountain by examining the transfer of the House Judiciary Committee's lawsuit seeking injunctive relief against Don McGahn.  Was it a "huge victory" for the President that Chief Judge Beryl Howell transferred the case?  (No.)

Then, it's time for a deep dive into the Presidential powers of apportionment and how Donald Trump can potentially do a court-clogging end-run around the Supreme Court's census decision even if he loses the 2020 election.

After that, it's time to check out a new segment from Cybertron -- the official "Optimist Prime" versus "Negatron" segment on impeachment.  Who will stand victorious?  Hint: he's got the energon axe.

Then, it's time for the answer to #T3BE 139, a dreaded real property question.  Did Thomas manage to get it right?  Listen and find out!

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. You can read Judge Howell's order in the McGahn litigation here.
  2. If you want to see a sitting federal judge call a DOJ lawyer's papers "halfhearted," check out this ruling, and turn to footnote 2 on page 6.
  3. This is the Census Bureau's non-answer to Congresswoman Pressley, and this is the NPR story confirming that the White House won't commit on apportionment.
  4. The transmittal law is 2 U.S.C. § 2.
  5. Good news!  Here's the latest tally on impeachment.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I'm happy to call my state representatives but I don't think I can summarize the situation and definitely don't understand what actions a state can take. Is there a concise summary of this I can point my reps to? Just "Trump will cheat aportionment to disregard the census in January 2021 and we need state laws to hold off on enactment til the new president is sworn in"? Or something?

Araya Frellin Sunshine

Out of curiosity say it all goes wahoonie shaped on Jan 3rd when say Warren gets in on the 23rd can she add to the supreme court to help balance it out before the cases even get that high?