Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content


Files

Comments

Anonymous

I'm guessing D - B is just silly, C seems to contradict itself (the reasoning in C seems to point to not awarding any damages, not nominal damages), and A might have been my guess if they'd actually hired a different tutor for $6000, but they didn't, The one thing I'm sure of is that the law firm owes the tutor $55,000 for saving them from the embarrassing mistake of hiring a lawyer who needs his mommy to arrange tutoring for him.

Anonymous

I agree with Laura's analysis. One extra thing I considered regarding answer C - even though the mother wasn't injured by the situation, is there any way the closeness of the relationship between parent and child could be consistent? For example, I could take out extra French lessons for my 14 year old son, the tutor doesn't perform as agreed (e.g. always shows up late, refuses to answer questions), and my son fails his exam. Is it not reasonable to sue on behalf of a close family member? I wouldn't expect my son to launch his own law suit! Would it matter if my son was an adult or minor at the time? Surely the son in the lawsuit above would be old enough to sue on his own?