Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Downloads

Content

Today's episode welcomes Monica Miller, counsel for the American Humanist Association, back to the show!  Miller, as you know, was the lead counsel and presented the AHA's argument before the Supreme Court in the American Legion v. American Humanist Ass’n case involving the 40-foot Latin cross on public property in Bladensburg, Maryland.

Andrew and Monica spend the entire show doing a deep dive into the decision, trying to figure out issues like (1) is the Lemon v. Kurtzman test really dead?; (2) how can we make sense of the court's admonition to "respect the beliefs" of those who oppose taking down the cross?; (3) how can local activists proceed in light of this decision, and much, much more!

After a wide-ranging interview, it's time for the answer to what Andrew has dubbed the Worst, Stupidest Bar Exam question -- this one involving the "equitable conversion" doctrine in the sale of land.  Did Thomas somehow manage to get a crazy, stupid, awful real property question correct?  Listen and find out!

Appearances

Andrew was just a guest host on Episode 100 of the Skepticrat; check it out!  And if  you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show (or at your live show!), drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com

Show Notes & Links

  1. Don’t forget to vote for us in the Podcast Awards by clicking on that link (or heading to www.podcastawards.com), clicking the blue “>> Nominations Now Open <<” box, registering with your email, and then selecting us in the drop-down boxes for “People’s Choice” and “News and Politics.” Thank you!! 
  2. We broke down the Bladensburg cross case in Episode 256, and interviewed Monica Miller after oral arguments in Episode 274; go check them both out!
  3. Finally, we broke down the details of the American Legion v. American Humanist Ass’n decision in Episode 290.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Files

Comments

Z-Score

Hey guys, how about doing Idiocracy for Law'd Awful movies? Hilarious, and covers some law stuff like legality of prostitution, public defenders, court room scenes, law schools, death penalty, legal news coverage, appointments of cabinet positions, emoluments to cabinet members. Also, Mueller She Wrote is going to review this movie with Gaslit Nation, maybe you guys can team up and have a super movie party. Either way, I recommend Idiocracy for your review.

law

Zachary: for a show like LAM (or GAM) to work, the underlying material has to be *bad*, not good. Idiocracy is funny! It's well-produced! It's got iconic moments in it. Those tend to make it a challenge to roast.

Anonymous

surprised to see that ya'll havent Law'd "God's not Dead"....I know ya wanna

Anonymous

https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/scathing-atheist/god-awful-movies/e/gam054-gods-not-dead-46485715 If you haven't heard the Puzzle in a Thunderstorm take on "God's not Dead" you're missing out. Eli may have mentioned a time or two that he invented Law'd Awful Movies. If you enjoy LAW'D, you'll enjoy GAM.