Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

Today's episode tries to put a positive spin on some recent developments, including the Supreme Court's gerrymandering decisions, the Department of Justice OIG report on the 2016 election, and the triumphant return of Everyone's Favorite Segment (TM):  "Are You A Cop?"

We begin with the Office of the Inspector General's 2016 Election Final Report, which we modestly point out validates literally everything we said in one of our favorite Episodes, OA 13, "Hillary Clinton's Damned Emails."  There's so much more to learn, so you'll want to listen up!

After that, we tackle the main segment, looking for some good news out of the Supreme Court's recent "decisions" on gerrymandering in Gill v. Whitford (Wisconsin) and Benisek v. Lamone (Maryland).  These 9-0 decisions are widely viewed as having punted on gerrymandering; is that right, and if so, what does the future hold?

After that, we tackle a trope that "everyone knows" in fan-favorite segment "Are You A Cop?"  This week, it's that "everyone knows" cops can't have sex with people in their custody, right?  RIGHT?  Well, thanks to one Democratic legislator in a deep red state, it's now true in Kansas, at least.

Finally, we end the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #81 regarding a law designed to target two college professors who crafted campus hate speech codes.  Remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE!

Recent Appearances

None!  If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. We first discussed Hillary Clinton's emails and the Comey investigation way back in Episode 13, and if you haven't listened, you should check it out!  Then, compare what we said then to the just-released Office of the Inspector General's 2016 Election Final Report.
  2. Our explainer on Gerrymandering is Episode 54; we then talk about the Wisconsin case in Episode 80 and the Maryland case in Episode 148.
  3. Of course, you can (and should!) read the Supreme Court's recent decisions on gerrymandering in Gill v. Whitford (Wisconsin) and Benisek v. Lamone (Maryland).
  4. Here is the text of Kansas HB2621, which amends KSA Supp. 21-5512(a), defining "unlawful sexual relations."  A "Severity Level 5 Person felony" is subject to 50-55 months in prison as per the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines.

Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law

Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!

And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Guys can you help me with an "Uncle Frank" style argument? As you may know I'm a Brit, but one of my colleagues is an American expat and a Trump-supporting Republican to boot. During one discussion he claimed that, prior to Obamacare, anybody could go to hospital and get treated; they could not legally turn you away even if you lacked insurance. His claim therefore is that Obamacare simply raised effective taxes. Now this all sounds like bullshit but I don't have the background knowledge to counter it. Can you help me out?

Anonymous

Hospital ERs were required to save your life and treat your acute conditions. They would not give you chemotherapy or radiation to cure your cancer. They would not treat your diabetes, but they would amputate your foot when it died. They would not pay for physical therapy or prosthetics after. So the way to get healthcare was to ignore it until it was an emergency, then under treat it. It also lead to people coming to the ER for non emergencies, like cuts that need a few stitches, or moderate fevers. This was ultimately paid for by higher prices for everyone in the hospital. (So there was already a hidden tax). Also, the hospital had an incentive to avoid treating you if they could. Obamacare spread the cost out over more time and more people, and included preventative, rehabilitative and quality of life care. Ultimately, this resulted in net lowered cost and net better outcomes.

Anonymous

This optimism episode did not age well.