Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content

34/100

Cult comedies from 1985 that I unaccountably skipped at the time aren't faring well when I finally catch up with them decades later. Unlike Clue (the enduring appeal of which I literally do not comprehend), Real Genius isn't borderline unwatchable; there are mildly amusing moments scattered here and there, even if I can't remember any specific examples a mere 36 hours later and none struck me as notable enough to jot down. But do the people who love this film and urged me to see it likewise revere, say, Bachelor Party, which was likewise written by Neal Israel and Pat Proft? Because the two movies strike me—assuming that I can trust my yeesh 37-year-old memory of Tom Hanks, "Party Animal"—as nearly identical in sensibility, proficiency and general funniness (or decided lack thereof). "I want to see more of you around the lab," William Atherton's usual authoritarian asshole tells Chris. "Fine, I'll gain weight" he replies. It's as if someone had been challenged to rewrite a Groucho Marx one-liner in a way that makes the humor strictly theoretical. I perked up briefly when Mitch descends into Lazlo's secret lair, but that turns out to be just a cautionary tale about what happens to someone who takes work and school too seriously. Nor can I remotely perceive Coolidge's signature here—mighty hard to connect the dots between this sort of tepid "iconoclasm" and Rambling Rose, or even Lost in Yonkers. (Haven't seen Valley Girl.) I dunno, fellas, what am I missing? Is Police Academy (also written by Israel & Proft) ripe for reappraisal? Should I check out Moving Violations?

But Val Kilmer, you perhaps object. Kilmer's terrific in Top Secret!, but seems badly miscast to me here in a role that practically screams Matthew Broderick (though maybe that wasn't the case pre-Ferris). He's never remotely credible as a brainiac, even allowing for the character's counterintuitive conception, and looks ill at ease whenever Chris isn't in full-bore goof mode. Which is admittedly not often, but then why bother with the scientific aspect at all? Just make a comedy about a type-A freshman and his devil-may-care roomie, which is all Real Genius really is at bottom. If you must stick with the whole exploiting-kids-for-a-military-contract business, at least come up with something less climactically lame than having a laser fill the bad guy's house with popcorn...and if you insist on going with that nonsense (which I guess some folks enjoy?), for god's sake find a setup that doesn't have me sitting there for over an hour wondering when the hell that random "I hate popcorn" line is finally gonna pay off. (No, I didn't know what was gonna happen. This film has somehow remained totally off my radar for almost 40 years. Not one familiar bit.) And maybe don't have Kent, following the commands of a mysterious voice in his head (okay, there's an example of very mild amusement—mostly the mid-sentence cuts from the booming, manipulated sound to Mitch speaking normally into the mic), see all of his nemeses unexpectedly outside Jerry's house, shouting at him not to go inside, and then just ignore them and go inside anyway rather than find out what the hell's going on. This movie is dumb. Oh, and Patti D'Arbanville! The fuck was that about? Mitch made her list of the 10 finest minds in the country at age 12, and she thought "Just three more years, then he'll be 15"? Or do three years elapse over the course of the movie, thereby making him legal? (In which case why hasn't Chris long since graduated?) THIS MOVIE IS DUMB. Michelle Meyrink's hyperactivity holds up okay, and I hadn't known until now that a contemporaneous film ended with "Everybody Wants to Rule the World," the song I most strongly associate with my high school years. Other than that, though, I genuinely have no idea why anyone would still care about this today. Enlighten me, fans and proponents. I yearn to understand. 

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Booooooooooooooo!!!!

Anonymous

Since you asked, and solely for the sake of comparison: https://www.thefilmyap.com/movies/class-of-1985-real-genius-my-science-project/

gemko

Okay, but seriously: Explain to me why this film is superior to the other Israel/Proft-scripted films from the same period that pretty much everyone agrees are bad. I don’t get it.

Anonymous

I can speak only for myself, but I wasn't voting for it because I thought you'd love it. I was voting for it because I thought you might give me a good idea of what <i>I</i> might have thought of it if I hadn't seen it four or five times while I was still a teen. It’s been at least 25 years since I last saw it, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s been more like 30. It's kind of hard to explain what it was that appealed to my teenage brain. Maybe because college was still impending for me, and I liked the idea that I wouldn’t have to spend four years with my nose buried in books. On those few occasions when I’ve even thought about it since then, I half suspected I wouldn’t find it nearly as entertaining anymore. But nostalgia will probably predispose me to be more forgiving of it than you. I’ll probably rewatch it sometime this week, if I can find it streaming somewhere. (I don’t own a copy.)

gemko

Okay, that’s helpful. A lot of what you admire is the film’s positive message, which isn’t the kind of thing I generally get excited about. (And you actually cite my example of a terrible joke as an excellent joke, so clearly the comedic aspect is very subjective.)

Anonymous

Fair points all. For me, it's a cup-filler for someone whose work intersects with college recruitment on the regular.

Anonymous

The film we watched in my video store twice a week. More than a film, it was a loving co-worker. I can think of no scene to back me up for the only scene I'm recalling right now is the one in Dirty Harry where the Scorpio Killer pays a guy to beat the shit out of him. Damn you D'Angelo Patreon!

Anonymous

It also occurs to me that Meyrink's character, Jordan, was unique in a teen comedy, and maybe even in the entirety of movies I had seen to that point in 1985.

gemko

So basically the same deal as Nicholas (see link elsewhere in these comments): It’s different in that it’s nicer—“generosity of spirit”; I’m sure you recall where I feel when we used to debate that topic on the nerd group—and you enjoy jokes like “I’ll gain weight” that I consider obviously lame. (It’s not the joke itself I object to so much as the laziness of its construction. There are so many wittier alternatives. Imagine Groucho just saying “Okay, I’ll gain weight.” Not in a million years.) Anyway, at least I have a sense now of what y’all respond to, even if I still find the film mostly unfunny.

Anonymous

My affection for it stems first from learning the dorm was on my college campus (also the façade for early “The Facts of Life”), but I just really dig Kilmer’s Fletch-like delivery. (“I hope so. I’m wearing his underwear.”) The one-liners (as I remember them) almost all work for me, even though I agree the laser plot is totally dumb and forgettable. But I’ve tossed many a drink back to the Socrates line. The daughter stuff cracks me up too. Kelley rolls her eyes every time I get a chance to tell her to “Take a step forward...” when she realizes too late we’re about to cha-cha. Agree with Russ on Meyrink’s uniqueness too. I haven’t seen it in a good, long while when it used to be a hungover afternoon Comedy Central and cable staple, so I look forward to reading Scott and Nicholas’s pieces after this to reminisce. As I think about it, a bit of the crude and goofy humor ports over nicely into “Office Space,” which also has a forgettable plot-moving device laid on top of some charming characters. I figured you wouldn’t like it, but it’s nice to take a nostalgia trip with fellow fans.

gemko

“I drank what?” was the one thing I actually laughed at. Perfectly delivered.

Anonymous

Okay, I rewatched it today. I still like it, even while recognizing many of your criticisms as valid. As I suspected, I'm much more forgiving of it than you. I think you're at least a little bit hung up on the idea that it was written by Israel and Proft. While I agree the rest of their stuff is (mostly) crap, this one isn't so bad.

gemko

It’s not as if I knew their filmographies going in. But when I looked them up afterward and saw that <i>Bachelor Party</i> was their previous film, it made perfect sense. I really don’t perceive a huge difference between the two, in terms of the actual comedy. (Though, again, it’s been nearly 40 years since I saw <i>Bachelor Party</i>, so perhaps I’m misremembering what it was like.)

Anonymous

I actually caught <i>Bachelor Party</i> flipping channels one day a few months ago, and I didn't think it held up particularly well. I still thought a few jokes were funny, but I didn't think I had to find a copy to add to my movie collection. Meanwhile, I'm trying to find out if the 2017 <i>Real Genius</i> Blu-ray is legit. (Amazon reviews say it's a BD-R, but that it was published by Sony. Seems unlikely that a major studio would distribute anything on BD-R.)

Anonymous

Yeah, the further I get from Bachelor Party, the more I realize the best scenes are the tennis scene and the rant about fire trucks and chicks and drugs and hookers...