Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

58/100

Massive spoilers.

The first Kaufman-penned film that strikes me as being much better directed than it is written. Not too surprising, perhaps, since this is as close as he's yet come to faithfully adapting another writer's work; I haven't read Reid's novel, but most of my issues with the movie (including, well, the basic premise) can evidently be traced back to it, while the aspects I like seem to be largely Kaufman's invention. With rare exceptions, revealing a major character to be imaginary doesn't work for me—I don't even much like Fight Club anymore, precisely for that reason. This is a particularly egregious example in that it's the ostensible protagonist who's a carefully constructed fiction, though I guess I give Kaufman (and especially Buckley, who's amazing) some credit for making this fairly obvious by around the time that Lucy/Louisa/Lucia/Ames tells Jake's parents the story of how she and Jake met, transforming into a radically different personality type in the process. I guessed shortly thereafter that everything we see constitutes Jake's projection, and that the "random" old janitor must be Jake's current incarnation. Trouble is, the movie has precious little to offer once you've tumbled to that, merely digging deeper and deeper into this pathetic dude's collection of references. Kaufman wisely avoids explaining everything at the end, as the book evidently does, and it's possible that the dream ballet and closing song might have worked better for me had I understood that both are lifted from Oklahoma!, the rare classic Broadway musical that I've still never seen in any form. (I also failed to recognize the Beautiful Mind parody, despite having seen that film twice.) At a certain point, though, it started to feel as if I were just waiting for the Big Reveal, and being denied an explicit answer key doesn’t retroactively alleviate the sensation of wheels forever spinning in the muck of faux erudition. Plus I really kinda can't believe that Kaufman actually made what's basically The 4.  

But! For the first time, I'm legitimately excited about Charlie Kaufman, Burgeoning Formalist. Much of this film (including a 22-minute stretch at the outset) consists of two people talking in a moving car, which is notoriously difficult to make visually interesting; Kaufman's coverage of these conversations is so dynamic and evocative that I sometimes had to force myself to listen as well as look. (Editor Robert Frazen probably deserves some credit, too, though his résumé—stuff like The Founder, Enough Said, Smokin' Aces, etc.—doesn't suggest a cutter extraordinaire. Oh, and the sound team, constantly shifting from interior to exterior and back again, dialogue abruptly muffled, subordinate to the sound of wind. And whoever was responsible for simulating snowy weather conditions outside the windows. A real collaborative effort.) Likewise, the staging at Jake's childhood home fairly wowed me, above and beyond all the time jumps and other foreground weirdness. The first time that everyone except the young woman mysteriously vanishes, Kaufman shoots her sitting at the table from a very precise overhead angle that makes it unclear whether Jake and his parents are physically absent or just not quite visible in the frame, which is dead-on perfect. So while I sometimes got exasperated by Thinking's thinking—never more so, I think, than when Kaufman and/or Reid decides it’s time to relitigate "Baby, It’s Cold Outside," which yeah okay might legitimately be something a Jake type would carry around in his head for years but still jesus christ not again—the film's forbidding elegance makes me fervently hope that people continue financing this guy's nutty experiments. 

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Your review was on point. Having seen Oklahoma and understanding the context of the "Lonely Room" song, I can't say that the context helps much except to confirm that she is a projection of some kind, that there never was a 'young woman.' The singer is envious of the main romance happening in the story, is tired of his lonely life, and vows to basically rape the woman by the end of the song. It was kind of a letdown of an ending for me after being fairly entranced by the film as a whole.

Anonymous

Great review, Mike! As an ardent detractor of the novel, my first reaction to the film was to appreciate that Kaufman took out Reid's stultifying "explanation" of the big twist ("...and on page 104, where Jake says 'the', it's because the janitor, when he was Jake's age, had also once said the word 'the'! And on page 105...") and replaced it with...well, mostly quite a lot of pop cultural references. (He pretty much had to put something in---remove all the Kaufman from this script and leave only the Reid, it runs fifteen minutes.) But the more I think about it, the more the references tend to ring false. I can believe, just barely, that the film's version of the janitor has seen "Oklahoma!" and filed it away in his subconscious, and "A Beautiful Mind", and the work of Pauline Kael. (The novel's version of the janitor has been completely non compos mentis for fifty years, caught in this loop of obsessing about what his life would have been like if he'd talked to this one girl at a bar when he was young; his characters don't make references.) It's not implausible to have a mental illness severe enough that you think you're both Jessie Buckley and Jesse Plemons, while also being able to take in the occasional musical. But I simply don't buy that he'd have internalized the Extremely Online/performatively-woke/only-over-the-past-decade-or-so debate about "Baby, It's Cold Outside"---not when his frame of reference for getting some ice cream is a commercial from the '50s.

Anonymous

Mike, have you read "Antkind"? I won't say more beyond the fact that it's a 700 page book about a film critic. I thought of you/your writing often while reading it. I feel it's rather plainly the best thing he has ever done and would be really interested in what you thought of it.

Anonymous

He's watching Oklahoma at the beginning, isn't he? He's sat watching the high school production.

Anonymous

I think what made it more interesting than a regular <em>Fight Club</em>-type scenario was precisely that "Lucy" is the main character, and her growing awareness and sporadic moments of agency suggest Jake's limited imagination and/or dementia - like he can't even get a consistent and satisfying fantasy going. That sets it apart from the usual "it was all in his head" thing, because Jake can't really manage to keep Reality at bay.

Anonymous

I struggled with this, as it seems way too obvious a mistake for Kaufman not to have considered. My theory is that just as the film extends to include all plausible versions of Jake's life experience, it extends to all versions of Kaufman's life experience. It's as meta as ADAPTATION in this sense, just less obviously externalised: the limits of Jake's life are what he's imagined, but the limits of Jake's life are also what Kaufman can imagine, and even if that's more far-flung and intellectually respectable, it still is a prison. (And yes, it's made explicit that the janitor is watching the students perform OKLAHOMA!, and has probably seen it a few times over his tenure.)