Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

91/100

I guess there’s a spoiler here regarding what happens to one character.

Still the quintessential New York movie to me, maybe because I lived mostly in Brooklyn. (My last apartment was about a mile and a half from where the film was shot). No big mystery why—the opening sequence (which I always forget features no credits until the very end, and which provided my first inkling that there was more to Elton John than his greatest hits album) serves up doc-style images of the city that are so pungent you can practically smell them. And of course much of what happens outside the bank feeds on the crowd's pugnacious energy, with Sonny repeatedly manipulating the police by playing to onlookers. But it's really Pacino's entire manically anxious performance that evokes New York. Sonny's in constant motion throughout, desperately trying to stave off disaster; even on the rare occasion when he's standing still, his eyes are darting around the room, seeking out the next inevitable problem. It's like watching a nervous breakdown that never quite does fully break down, and something about the way that Sonny feels existentially beset by an absurd situation that he himself created—about his combination of can-do initiative and why-me? futility—reads very specifically NYC to me. So, too, does the film's matter-of-fact acceptance of gender dysphoria, the existence of which was barely even publicly acknowledged at the time. I'm not in a position to say whether Dog Day Afternoon treats Leon with respect (for one thing, it calls her Leon), but the character certainly isn't reduced to a cheap punchline, as might easily have been the case. Even the cops take this development largely in stride. Just another day in New York. Nothing they haven't seen before.

Lumet deserves enormous credit for engineering this vibe. He shoots the first half of the film practically in real time—49 minutes elapse before we see a clear temporal leap (when the cops retrieve Angie). The camera is mobile without ever being flashy, seeming to respond on the fly when things happen, yet always in the right place at the right time. (It's the formal equivalent of acting that looks improvised but has actually been strenuously rehearsed, which almost always plays better than actual on-camera improv.) Some glorious moments—Sonny getting momentarily startled when he backs into a potted plant stuck in the corner of the bank's vestibule; Sonny and Sal trying to talk from a distance but losing each other behind support columns—could be happy accidents or scripted chaos, with roughly equal probability. And the overall loose-limbed approach, applied to a tightly-wound personality, makes sudden deviations from that aesthetic really count. Dede Allen generally maintains a measured pace, allowing plenty of breathing room; when Sonny fires his gun in response to an attempted police entry in the back, however, she cuts 14 times in eight seconds. Not only does this work like gangbusters, but it foreshadows the conclusion of Sonny's adventure, which similarly features 21 cuts (the last seven of them almost subliminal) in about 20 seconds. That can be remarkably effective when employed sparingly and with purpose. 

The ending otherwise remains frustrating. It feels needlessly beholden to the real-life story (even though numerous names and details were altered—Sal was only 18, for example, whereas John Cazale was almost 40), and largely divorced from the anti-authoritarian dynamic that fuels most of the movie. One of my pet peeves is people who get up and exit the theater at the precise moment that a film's plot gets resolved, as if nothing that follows could possibly be of any importance; Dog Day Afternoon basically imposes that move on us, abruptly ending as soon as we know everyone's fate. There's no poetry to it, no food for thought. I'd have preferred some whole-cloth invention, perhaps predicated on Sonny misunderstanding the nature of his ostensible fan club's allegiance. This time, though, I did experience a little frisson from the sheer blunt finality of that denouement: Sonny's complete silence and thousand-yard stare; the whining of jet engines in the background, forcing everyone else to shout; Sal's corpse unceremoniously wheeled past Sonny and around a corner; no music; remarkably terse where-are-they-now? text; minimal closing credits; continuing ambient tarmac noise suddenly terminated by a hard cut to black (at a time when that was fairly unusual). It does feel harsh, and that was surely the idea. 

Files

Comments

Anonymous

This is certainly due for a rewatch on my part. Great piece!

Anonymous

On the subject of Elizabeth (who, if the movie does use that name, it might be best to do so in the review): I read in Lumet’s book that he was primarily aiming to find a way for the audience to take the reveal seriously and (iirc) stay invested in Sonny’s situation. I’m glad that he opted for that, as it downplays the “freak” factor a lot—whether or not that was out of compassion or storytelling instincts I’m not sure, but it’s still fairly remarkable for the time. On the other hand, I think a better way to do that might’ve been to portray her less stereotypically. I haven’t seen the movie in a while, but I do recall her having mannerisms that read very “gay male,” (and not much else) which I’m not keen on. Granted, it’s the 70’s, but even if it was the case of a gay guy getting money for his, say, gay male lover’s medication, I think I’d still have issues with the portrayal—that it’s a trans woman makes it even thornier. And while I’m not gonna come down to hard on a 1975 movie for casting a cis guy, the real-life Elizabeth looked nothing like the actor who plays her. Which is to say I think casting a handsome but decidedly masculine man as a trans woman (who presented very femme in real life) feels like a missed opportunity for bringing the issue to the public eye. Then again, the movie helped pay for her surgery so maybe it was all worth it.

gemko

Most of the names were changed for the film—Sal is the only real exception. Leon isn’t Elizabeth Eden’s actual deadname, and I think it’s the only name anyone calls her onscreen analogue. Can’t swear to that but I don’t recall a female name ever being spoken. Sonny always says Leon, and always uses male pronouns (which I also vaguely recall John Wojtowicz doing in <i>The Dog</i>).

Anonymous

I hadn't seen the movie in two years (just skimmed Wikipedia to see the film uses her name, which it implies) it does. If the movie only uses "Leon," then you're probably fine. I tend to err on the side of caution.

gemko

Actually even the closing text reads “Leon Shermer is now a woman and living in New York City.” That’s it. I’m pretty sure that’s the only name we ever hear.

Anonymous

Yeah, that ties into the issue in my second graf—the film's not judgemental at all, but definitely treats her like a man.

gemko

At least it says “is now a woman” rather than “now lives as a woman.” Admittedly the implication is that surgery is a necessary condition, but it’s something (especially for 1975). Btw are you a <i>Pose</i> fan? I’m three episodes in and really enjoying it.

Anonymous

I haven't seen it! I don't watch much TV. Will definitely check it out.

Anonymous

Thanks for this, Mike. Glad to hear that it still holds up for you after all these years! (It's my favourite film, so was hoping that to be the case.) For those interested in another perspective (albeit a glowing one) from another brilliant critic, check out this: http://nick-davis.com/favfilmsdogday.html