Home Artists Posts Import Register
The Offical Matrix Groupchat is online! >>CLICK HERE<<

Content

60/100

Thought for a while that I understood what Von Trier's up to here, and was completely on board. Rehash of Nymph()maniac's  confessional-cum-dialectic admittedly felt a bit lazy, but each of the first two Incidents hilariously undermines Jack's pompous claim to artistry, painting him as pathetic and inept. 1st Incident sees Thurman's stranded motorist browbeat Jack into becoming a serial killer, an idea that doesn't even appear to have occurred to him until she starts constantly suggesting ways that he might murder her; it's a masterfully disarming initial salvo, too darkly comic to register as victim-blaming. (I might have preferred a male victim, to avoid any hint of misogyny, but that wouldn't have served Von Trier's actual purpose, which is in part to interrogate that very charge as it's been made against him in the past.) Likewise the magnificent 2nd Incident, which imagines what it might be like if Inspector Clouseau or Chad Feldheimer decided to start killing random strangers (and suffered from OCD). All the while, Jack keeps insisting to "Virge"—a tad cute, that, though at least there's a literal payoff in the epilogue—that these miserable, maladroit crimes merit comparison not just to great architecture but to Picasso, Goethe, Bob Dylan. Its a bit like what Tarantino did with Stuntman Mike, except that Von Trier juxtaposes self-glorifying myth with sorry reality right from the jump, rather than creating a diptych. 

Or so I'd concluded at that point, maybe an hour in. But no, The House That Jack Built turns out to be The Self-Portrait That Lars Painted, and Jack, like an actual artist, gains confidence and authority as he continues to hone his craft. That's not to say that Von Trier isn't genuinely struggling with his demons here, wondering aloud whether he's devoid of empathy and whether that may be necessary to transcend the banal. But I found the 3rd and 4th Incidents, in which Jack exhibits near-total control and begins romancing the women he kills, not so much disturbing or distressing* as simply uninteresting. Black comedy gives way to standard-issue creeping sadism, oddly inflected in the 4th Incident by Kitty Genovese-style indifference (can't see how that fits into any autocritique, unless Von Trier's annoyed by how few people saw The Boss of It All) and an MRA rant that comes out of nowhere and feels like an atypically desperate bid at topical relevance. 5th Incident largely reverts to the previous tone, and the epilogue gets points for boldness and visual grandeur, but the movie kinda lost me over the course of that unpleasant, unilluminating hour. Wasn't offended or outraged, or even bored. Just indifferent, which I'm sure is the last thing Von Trier would ever want.

* Note to fellow chickens when it comes to onscreen torture and suffering: The big mutilation you might have heard about isn't nearly as graphic or prolonged as I'd feared. Still not fun to watch, mind you, but we're not talking about Audition here. It's mostly some truly gross stuff that happens afterward that kept the Cannes cut from getting an R.) 

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Did you have any issue with the use of real-life footage of atrocities? I myself found it offensive, but I recognize I’m in the minority there (I also found some of the 4th Incident’s similarities to the allegations a little...not great. Again, minority opinion.)

gemko

No, that didn’t bother me. Not sure if it’s footage from Night and Fog (which I’ve only seen once, long ago), but certainly it’s footage that could have been in that film, or other unflinching documentaries. And it’s used here in a pedagogical way, not just to goose the viewer. I’d actually forgotten about it until you reminded me.

Anonymous

I don't know why we're meant to think Jack isn't already a serial killer in the opening incident as he already has a) his serial killer van (with the back windows blacked out and b) his freezer storage facility. Even if she's his first actual victim (which I'm less sure of considering his past of torturing animals) he seems to have all of his ducks in a row at that point.

Anonymous

Huh, I had a viscerally angry reaction to that, as I did to the 4th incident (which felt to me as a sort-of backhanded apology for how he’s treated women, including Björk). But I’m coming around to me being wrong.

gemko

Dillon doesn’t play that scene like Jack sees this woman as a potential victim. He keeps trying to get rid of her, and she won’t let him. Don’t imagine Ted Bundy ever had that problem. And there’s an explanation for why he has the freezer, some failed business deal involving the pizzas. If we were meant to understand that this was a fake deal intended only to secure victim storage, that voiceover was poorly written imo. To me the film clearly suggests that he stumbles into it, in much the same way that he escapes detection at the end of the 2nd Incident due to sheer chance. (That’s Ed, I don’t have an answer for why his van’s window is blacked out, though otherwise it just seems like a van. Apart from Thurman calling it a serial-killer van, which I don’t take literally since everything on earth screams “serial killer” to her.)

Steven Carlson

I suppose it's just my rationalization for a dumb pun, but it seems like the title kind of gives the 1st incident away as indeed the origin story, inasmuch as everything after is the house that particular jack, the one that is used to brain Uma, built.

Anonymous

I'm curious how you feel in regards to the 3rd Incidents' victims. Seems like the only "shocking" part of the movie given the extreme level of violence shown to children, which in any case is upsetting.

gemko

I’m only bothered by suffering. The kids’ deaths are quick, and you can do anything to a corpse without it fazing me in the slightest.

Frank Howley

Thanks for this review, saw this alone at my local uncut screening and have been dying to hear other's opinions. A new patron and already thankful for it.