Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

You can check out the full reaction in our catalog here - https://rebrand.ly/2371dd

Files

maxresdefault.jpg

Check out our Full Movie/TV Shows Reactions on Patreon :) ✔ PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/thehomiesreact ✔ Michelle - https://linktr.ee/Michellemoonsugar ✔ Viki - https://linktr.ee/vikioutofspace ✔ Lia - https://linktr.ee/liavibes ✔ Ellie - https://www.instagram.com/ellielandgo ✔ Larry - https://www.instagram.com/larrymoorebg/ ✔ For early reactions you can join as a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL204Vhbdwupfb3mn96SvPQ/join ✔ Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/The_HomiesTV ✔ Twitter - https://twitter.com/The_HomiesTV ✔ Discord - https://discord.gg/jmJ8btd

Comments

Squeebers

I wanna point something out that will show you just how much I pay attention. When Remy and Linguine make "Sweetbread a La Gusteau" Colette says, "The recipe doesn't call for White Truffle Oil." Most professional chefs say that White Truffle Oil is so easily misused that most professionals don't dare touch it. Chef Ramsay has even gone so far to say that it shouldn't even exist as an ingredient. Just to put it in perspective the picture they are painting. How talented Remy is at cooking that he successfully used that ingredient.

Squeebers

How you can tell a movie is a classic: You watched it hundreds of times and it never loses an ounce of charm. I've seen this movie so many times. At one point I could've quoted the entire thing. And yet, I just re-watched it after not seeing it for a year or two and I enjoyed every single second of it. CLASSIC MOVIE!

David Blake

Movies such as "Robin Hood" (1973), "The Sword In the Stone" (1963), "One Hundred And One Dalmatian" (1961), "Alice In Wonderland" (1951), "Dumbo" (1941) and "Pinocchio" (1940) don't give me the same magic as contemporary CGI animated films (obviously not all, but most do). They are "cold", devoid of emotion. They have some good lines, but in terms of emotion and involvement they leave something to be desired (at least for my taste). Maybe I think so because I was born in an age when as children we watched hand-drawn cartoons (TV series and movies) and they thrilled us. Then, growing up and seeing the ones in CGI, we noticed the difference. The under 25s, on the other hand, grew up with CGI and looking at the hand-drawn ones they think it's rubbish, without grasping its true essence... I was born in 1980 but, for example, I still really appreciate movies like "The Great Dictator" released in1940 (obviously it's not a cartoon) or "Fantasia", also from 1940 (40 years before my birth). I also really like mixed media films, as we call them in Italy (live-action movies, therefore with real actors, but with the addition of hand-drawn cartoons), such as "Mary Poppins" (1964), "Bedknobs And Broomsticks" (1971) and " Who Framed Roger Rabbit "(1988). I come to realize that by hand drawing a frame by frame in an animated movie compared to moving a line of drawing in CGI to the PC is a much slower process (therefore more expensive), but the charm and magic of past times are unfortunately losing with these cartoons in CGI...!

Aaron Barlow

Not so. When a studio like Pixar is involved, great care is taken with characters and story, art direction and animation. Pixar movies are extremely emotionally involving and often have more resonance with adults. CG is just a medium, as is hand drawn, a way to tell a story, it has no bearing on the quality of the story itself. Granted 2d animation lends itself to exaggerated expressiveness as you can push characters in ways that are not physically tenable in 3d but CG can produce very expressive cartoony characters if done right. CG makes it easier to create an animated film relative to hand drawn but the quality and emotional resonance is entirely dependent on the creator, not the medium. For example, compare 'Foodfight' to 'Ratatouille'. I apologise for exposing you to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uROQ9nplxIY

Julian

one of my favourite movies . some of the best.