Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

Colorado magistrate judge N. Reid Neureiter has sanctioned the attorneys behind one of the many baseless 2020 election lawsuits, saying that they took advantage of “gullible members of the public”. If you’ve been waiting for some kind of justice or accountability for the many frivolous election lawsuits, I think you’ll enjoy this ruling. The lawsuits were brought on behalf of the plaintiffs by attorneys Gary D. Fielder and Ernest John Walker. These attorneys are now the subjects of the massive $186,000 sanctions order.

Files

Judge Slams Election Lawsuit Lawyers with $186,000 in Sanctions (O'Rourke v. Dominion)

Colorado magistrate judge N. Reid Neureiter has sanctioned the attorneys behind one of the many baseless 2020 election lawsuits, saying that they took advantage of “gullible members of the public”. If you’ve been waiting for some kind of justice or accountability for the many frivolous election lawsuits, I think you’ll enjoy this ruling. The lawsuits were brought on behalf of the plaintiffs by attorneys Gary D. Fielder and Ernest John Walker. These attorneys are now the subjects of the massive $186,000 sanctions order. #Election #Lawsuit #Sanctions Continue the discussion with the Lawful Masses Discord Community: https://discord.gg/SpC2utzr56 Support Lawful Masses! patreon.com/ljfrench sponsus.com/law THANK YOU SUPPORTERS! November 2021 $50+ Supporters: John Steel, Gavin Barnard, Eevi, Spirit Bear, Benjamin Hitov, Ugly Grill, torpedan, ShadowTycho, Earthbound Star, PureMagma, Drew Hart, TechTechPotato, Eric Tams, The Blood Soaked Survivors November 2021 $5+ Supporters: Christoph Bolliger, Arron Washington, Keith Marrocco, Dustin Rodriguez, Josué Vicioso, Cindy Campbell, Brian Flowers, Mark Curtis, Lazy Wolf, Aethero Toland, Nick Bush, Gergely Varju, John Swanson, matthew beller, Priscilla Astling, Schuyler Rowe, As the World Burns, Human Resource, First Last, Dawn Massaro Guy, David Zaslavsky, Roger Chen, Christian Ullrich, Brian Roush, Rudolph Bescherer Jr, Firstname Mclastname, Lydia Collinson, Strawberry Puptart, HotGrillsInYourArea, JH, Stephen Bank, Tron BÃ¥rdgÃ¥rd, Mark Randall, Richard Shotwell, Sarah Gerweck, Matthew East, Pat Delaney, Michael Howard, Mario Bonales, Michael Kenton, Euchale, Ian McDonald, Marcus Agehall, Joe Roberts, Sokar117, Jonathan Robillard, Amanda Gillies, Justin Waddell, Andrew Sellers, Nathaniel, Tony Cruickshank, Druid, Richard Jeffery, Jason Lingle, Zzyzx Wolfe, Kasaryth, Oisin Creaner, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Stephen Christopher, Keuric, TEEKAY, Stefan Persson, Frederick Cooper, HenTropy, CombatZAK, Jaimeson LaLone, Alexander Sihn, Kate Rijacki Ledum, Naomi Pool, Andrew Reid, David McGuire Jr., Gregory Ford, EnvyingWrath, Brody Eastwood, sehro, Brian Rossman, Steven Hess, FunnyHats, Dzyan, Chris Lindsay, allquixotic, Albert Demello, Rico Robbins, Kean Maizels, Durga Devi, Darkwolf, Anthony Webb, Joseph Alexander Brown, John Peter, Daniel Kertesz, Evan Foster, Nathaniel Reindl, Kai Raphahn, HÃ¥kan Andersson, Andrew "FastLizard4" Adams, Jesse Stam, Gumblejak, Si Wellings, Mitchell Thatcher, Hans Jacob Stephensen, Jessica Pearson, RedR0ze, LbxAni, Daniel Ducharme, Ph.D., majikthise, foonix, TheEuphoGuy, Anonymous Lizard, rfc805, Brian, Matthew Bertrand, Jack Draak, DyneOnline, Eye_Make_Stuff, Nick Rowland, Timothy James Dodd, DreamerDon, Scott F. Comstock, James Melanson, Lewis, Kat Willhite, Komrade Kettenkrad, Matt Arnold, Alan Nise, anton.molyboha, Kyle Siefring, Marianne Fletcher, te-online, The Disturbed Angel, Elliott Ingram, Eric Woodley, Raindrop Works, Liryca, Callie D, Logan Stromberg, scj643, Chris Connett, Haplo, Michael Ciesielski, Chris Hilliard, KoblerMan, Eric Barker, Travus, Q Squared, Greg, Jeffrey Cash, Gef the Mongoose, toadbear, Kory Sagawa, Jonathan Barchi, Jason Glaesemann, DrJKL, Lawrence Groupe, Michael, Andrew Venier, Peter Huston, QuasiAutonomous Bosch, CacklingDonut, Bill Tonnies, Rabid Ronin, Thomas Dinsdale-Young, Zendane, vknorris4, Katrina Middleton, varia, jag1110, STEVE YOCUM, kildes, Alisdair Meredith, Bill Somerville, Benn M, Mike Dunford, Kasper Brandt, Haemocyte, James Oxford, AlCD, JohnSwanson, Michael Stokes-Byrne, JovialJuggernaut, c, Jorge Vittes, Nate Gray, Tony Webster, Ross, Dustin Bosveld, Jeff Gordon, Lucas Wireman, Landon Noll, Bryan Lubeck, Lawful Leah, Paul, Globochemist, Rodney Nelson, Scott Rushing, Chip Phelps, Ivan Chepurnyi, Rob Voisey, Kris Hetzel, Christina B, Thedougler303, Maarten Wisman, Negligibly Negative, Dan McCammon, Robert Z, Matthew E, OsculatingPlane, sean murphy, Landon Noll, Chet McMasterson, Abby Sulima, Why Hate, Cmdr Obbert42, EyesWideOpen, Irene Torkel, Thomas Richard Tetreault, Justin Bassett-Green, Ryan Schott, Richard Margolin Colorado Elections Lawsuit Sanctions 00:00 - Introduction 00:33 - The Original Complaint 03:21 - The Lawsuit is Dismissed 06:06 - The Judge Imposes Sanctions 13:24 - The Amount of the Sanctions 18:10 - Credits & Thanks!

Comments

Judith Bradford

it makes me extremely nervous that the Supreme Court seems unable to recognize that the new Texas law giving "standing" to ANYONE who disapproves of abortion to sue anyone who enables one for damages. At least one justice, during oral arguments over the suit brought by a federal official over the unconstitutional nature of the law, made up absolutely bizarre "examples" of hypothetical situations in which someone else's termination of a pregnancy could possibly "wrong" anyone else in a way suitable to judicial remedy by lawsuit. For instance, he said, what if someone TOLD a pregnant woman why she shouldn't have an abortion and really CARED about her having the baby-- wouldn't he have "invested" in its eventual existence in such a way that a woman who didn't FOLLOW his advice would have "deprived" him of his expected pleasure in her obedience and pride in having caused the baby's birth? GAH! A *Supreme Court Justice" who ought to know better actually advanced this idea, that any man who "invested" his time in "explaining" to some woman what she was supposed to do could have standing to sue for monetary damages if she chose to act against his advice-- how dare anybody exercise independent judgment that fails to agree with some arrogant mansplainer's 'splaining? I noted that the alleged wrong the disobedient person allegedly did to the "investor" in her baby's being born didn't involve any financial or other responsibility FOR that birth, just his having TOLD her what she ought to do.... which, apparently, might count as sufficient standing for the dispenser of instructions to sue. Does everyone's brain just STOP WORKING where termination of pregnancy is at issue? Can you imagine "not doing as you're told" to count as a legal wrong in any other configuration of teller, told, and action? "She TOLD you to pull out before you had an orgasm" wouldn't even count for a woman to sue a guy for deliberately getting her pregnant! Is slighting some male's pretension to authority to be imagined as a wrong done to him, for which you must pay if he chooses to sue? The precedents they're willing to let stand in order to "save the innocent potential babies" are going to wreck a lot more judicial norms unless they pull their "pro-life" heads out of those special-pleading fundaments....