Home Artists Posts Import Register

Poll

About the Quarterly Omnis...

  • I like it! 5
  • I hate it! 0
  • I had no idea this was a feature...but I like this idea 2
  • I had no idea this was a feature...but would prefer the original idea 0
  • 2017-04-06
  • —2017-04-18
  • 7 votes
{'title': 'About the Quarterly Omnis...', 'choices': [{'text': 'I like it!', 'votes': 5}, {'text': 'I hate it!', 'votes': 0}, {'text': 'I had no idea this was a feature...but I like this idea', 'votes': 2}, {'text': 'I had no idea this was a feature...but would prefer the original idea', 'votes': 0}], 'closes_at': datetime.datetime(2017, 4, 18, 14, 52, 20, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'created_at': datetime.datetime(2017, 4, 6, 19, 0, 55, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc), 'description': None, 'allows_multiple': False, 'total_votes': 7}

Content

 (Going to open this up to all patrons, since it affects everyone). 

I know one of the things I wanted to do was have regular collections of polished work and I would be lying if I said I was even close to living up to that goal.  Even giving every story just a quick touch is difficult, much less doing more robust revisions.

So I am considering a new method which will probably be more focused on theme rather than yearly quarter. I would probably have you all vote from some options, revise a few stories that I felt embodied that theme, and also write something new. Those are effectively the milestone goals we have hit so far, so you all are not losing anything earned. 

In theory, doing it this way means collections more often and with content you all want to see lovingly revised to take the story beyond the parameters of a sketch.

So what do you think? 

Comments

No comments found for this post.