Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Hi everyone.

For the first time since I started producing this videos I’ve received quite negative feedback from a few of you guys so I wanted to address that.

In my latest video about the Colganair crash I decided to change up the storytelling up a bit. Instead of putting all the causes and outcomes at the end, I wove some of them into the actual story (the fatigue, the crash pads, the non-sterile chatter as well as the likely reason for the captains opposite handling of the event)

I did that because I wanted to focus more, in the end, on the legislative outcome of the crash which was the 1500h get rule and the fact that that this rule came about WOTHOUT any recommendation from the report.

In the original video I also talked a bit more about the changes to simulator training around the stick-pusher and upset/recovery training but decided to just fold that into “improved training” to focus on the main point.

Doug mentioned that I didn’t “close the sack” properly at the end and there might be some truth to that but I figured that my question in the beginning; “it changed the US aviation industry, but was it for the correct reasons?” Was answered by the very end statement of how this accident led to the senate creating a law that had very little to do with the actual accident.

I will try to keep the ending quite short and to the point, going forward, and the reason for that is simple. When we look at the audience retention of our videos, there is a clear “drop of” after the accident happens where the people don’t stay and listen to the outcome. In order to teach people as much as we can from these accidents, we need to get the learning points into the story as much as we can.

There is a new NOW video being produced right now that will look even deeper into the effects of the 1500h rule, I hope that will also straighten out some question marks.

I am sorry if the codeo disappointed some of you. There is almost always more details to go into in these reports but we pride ourselves in destilling down the most important ones.

Files

Comments

Anonymous

I always love watching the whole video.

Lynne Bennett

Re hoping to keep viewers engaged. Petter, to understand why people leave a video after a crash rather than watch the rest of the story, it's important to consider the reasons they watched in the first place, one of which is -WARNING! WARNING!- rather ghastly.  It's referred to as the thrill of the macabre. Members of an underground subculture scour the internet for every plane/ train/ ship crash for the purpose of collecting images & video of deceased victims world-wide. There's an element of eroticism associated with this cultish practice as well. The most prized finds are videos of dismembered persons; the ultimate prize is actually going to the scene and stealing a body part, complete with video to establish provenance if the limb is to be sold or traded.  With GPS coordinates, SUVs, Go-pros and scanners for listening to fire and police radio traffic, it is possible to beat first responders to some crash sites, and then later blend into the crowd if there wasn't time to get away before officials arrived. Survivors have  complained about scavengers rooting through debris and picking up an arm or leg but were mollified when told it was a rescue mission - a cruel lie. Not surprisingly, nothing about this behavior gets reported on the evening news. These individuals have no interest in learning anything about aviation so there's no reason to stay tuned following crash scenes. No doubt they don't watch the beginning either, fast-forwarding to crash segments and quickly moving on to the next video. I learned about this practice through my work as a forensic social worker and a volunteer with our county's K-9 search & rescue team. Your videos are insightful and an excellent source of aviation education. Please don't let yourself be bullied by YT to do something to increase or stabilize your viewership (or whatever they want to call it). YT doesn't care about viewership except as a method to increase its income from channels. I'll close with an apology to fellow patreons and to Petter's staff if my comment offends. I wouldn't be comfortable sharing it outside this group but wanted to explain how some Mentour viewers going away prematurely has nothing to do with his presentation.