Home Artists Posts Import Register

Downloads

Content

Dr Kirk and Bob answer patron emails.


00:00 Bob's Return to Butler Syndrome and Other Things

00:35 Betrayal trauma

03:10 Emotionally distant

04:59 Butler syndrome

31:21 Charities & OPP

34:33 Kirk & Bob's first impressions of each other

35:48 Resentment

40:30 Colleen's retirement

42:33 Tics but not Tourette's

46:52 Multiple diagnoses

51:07 Minimizing romantic anxiety 

54:33 Difficulty identifying emotions


From our sponsor, BetterHelp: Need a therapist? Try BetterHelp! https://www.betterhelp.com/kirk

Get started today and enjoy 10% off your first month. Discount code “KIRK" will be automatically applied.


Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle

Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact

Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle

Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/

Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@kirk.honda


The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®


Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.


Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Love this podcast, I can never say it enough! Perhaps lightning round should be ditched?! Maybe called something else? I don’t think you can answer these questions in less than a minute. But, more or staying on the question. Not that I don’t love the rants too :)

Anonymous

For the listener setting boundaries with a mother battling cancer, it feels so good to hear Dr. Kirk articulate why "children of abuse" have a right to protect themselves from more abuse. I love how Dr. Kirk and Dr. Bob consistently illuminate both sides of an impasse. Examples: is Colt being unreasonable or is Debbie? Well, Colt is having understandable reactions in an attempt to protect himself as a child of abuse and SIMULTANEOUSLY Debbie's actions are understandable viewed through the lens of her attachment needs. Is Jeanette McCurdy's Mom evil, or is there an articulable chain of cause and effect occurrences that lead to the problematic parenting? Is Jeanette McCurdy being an ungrateful child or rather is she using her platform to support children of abuse everywhere? Is Johnny Depp abusive or is Amber Heard abusive? None of these statements mutually exclude the other and Dr Bob and Dr Kirk resist the urge to gain a listnership by painting boolean answers landing definitively on "right" and "wrong". Instead they paint the complex tapestry and let listeners benefit from the part of the painting that they need to see in order to recover themselves.

Anonymous

Honestly this is the best reason why I continue to be a Patreon supporter. Professionalism lives in the grey. Not because of plausible deniability to those who object but because both sides. deserve to be heard. It’s easy to scale an audience when you pick a side. It’s respectable when you don’t.