Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

Johnny Depp v Amber Heard #3 (Patreon)

Published:
2022-05-04 14:01:02
Imported:
2024-02

Downloads

Content

Dr. Kirk Honda reacts to the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard trial.


image: GabboT, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons


Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle

Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact

Get merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle

Dr. Kirk’s Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/

Discord: https://discord.gg/6QR4sE8x9K

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PsychologyInSeattle/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PsychInSeattle

Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/

Facebook Fan Page (run by fans): https://www.facebook.com/groups/112633189213033


The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®


Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.


Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

Files

Comments

Anonymous

The forensic psychologist utilized by the Depp team seems clearly biased for several reasons. One, she was hired by the Depp team and has a financial motivation to provide findings that support Depp's case; two, she states "I do not recall" in key moments in cross-examination, where she would clearly have recall (which is also lying under oath); three, making two significant mental health diagnoses--which are about as damaging of diagnoses as one can make--without significant time to diagnose. She is also being dishonest about BPD not being far more diagnosed in women than men (it is) and the (her claim, no) crossover between BPD and trauma (there is a significant crossover between BPD and trauma, especially sexual abuse). I feel like there is too much open-mindedness towards the psychologist here; we need to be mindful that psychologists utilized in court cases are not unbiased and their findings should be viewed through an extremely skeptical lens. I am a LICSW in WA.

Matthew Black

My impression is that she did not diagnose Heard with anything, she said that she had MMPI results that were consistent with BPD and HPD. Keep in mind that lawyers are allowed to ask leading or deceptive questions in cross-examination (eg ‘isn’t it true that you diagnosed Ms Heard with x) and their objective is to discredit the opposing side ‘s witness, not neutrally uncover the facts of the case. This is why Heard’s lawyer asked Curry if she is Board Certified-IMO she was trying to mislead the jury into thinking she is unlicensed.