Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Matrix ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register
Patreon importer is back online! Tell your friends ✅

Should breasts be deformed? (Patreon)

Published:
2021-11-16 10:13:13
Imported:
2021-11

Content

Images with options in the previous post.
Something is wrong with patreon, poll was duplicated several times, but now everything seems to be fine.

Comments

SPARK352

Some of each is fun🥰🥰🥰 I never want to restrict the creativity of a creator!!!!!!!! Kinda defeats the purpose of creating.

Anonymous

I think depends on situation. There was one scene in Set 3 that I loved when the girl had something put into her nipples, it was great! But Spark is right, love anything you come up with!

Fit

Personally, I love the huge, clearly visible bulges a lot, and if you ask me, they could even travel up some more (speaking of your previous post). I always imagine how hot it would be if she gave that giant cock an "internal" titfuck. But I agree with others that it would probably be best to serve both sides and create alternative versions

IBT

At the time of this posting, there are 82 total votes ... which appears to be a 32 to 50 vote split, which is essentially a 2:3 result ratio of ~2 Yes votes for every ~3 No votes. Although this means that the Yes votes are (still) a minority of the votes, they are a pretty significant minority ... enough so that it makes me think there is enough of an audience for both that both ought to be catered to, just with different variations on the exact same poses like Hold demonstrated below. That way, everyone can choose their preference of which version to view, rather than being forced into a One Size Fits All™ type of release solution. It means more work for Hold to produce the alternate images, but not THAT much work since the commonality between the variants is going to be quite high (just move the position of end of the penis at maximum penetration). However, a little bit of extra work like that for both broader audience appeal AND added replay value would seem (to me, anyway) to be worth the added expense/effort.

Anonymous

Do the extreme that's what we want to be shocked. Exaggeration followed by a realistic consequence thus deformed tits just maybe limit to just the money shot keep it uniqu then the no votes can't complain as it makes up 3% of the scenes.

Anonymous

Actually after reading some no comments it would be best to let the audience choose what level of extreme or penis size so everyone's happy. Hell then you can change the rating from rated g to rated x. If you animated it then allow audience to set rating before the start . I beleave the film industry is going to have to add this aspect to movies in general. I've been working on the concept and imagine 3 directors three alternative plots and three different main character's and three sound tracks. Instead of pick one and watch it.each time audience has to choose left or right depending it will switch between directors actors and music creating 100s of possabilitys and alternate versions. This will cause multiple viewings of same film and a copy should be offered to audience of the version just watched. People can then compare who's version is the best or funniest or saddest. In theaters it would be done on cellphones with majority rules again multiple viewings in theater's would be fun to see how movie changes. I started writing my first film as a low budget horror film based on a movie that was made using an internet survey asking what people wanted to see. Snakes on a plane got most votes after watching movie I new people don't know what they want to see or they don't see the whole picture. But I think I know what they want to see by studying pop culture in film music art and so on what's self. So I came up with sharks on a train. I even set up a sharks on a train facebook as I was not concerned about idea their no one would try to make something so extremely strange. But infant it's why they want to see it to see how that could happen sharks on a train. Then if it's good or fun to watch you get franchises. 8 months later sharknado came on scifi. At lest in sharknado5 they paid tribute with a fifteen minute fighting sharks on a train scene. Crazy as it sounds it was someone like ridley Scott or some other famous person I had as friends on the Facebook or it's councadince. But another movie I was writing while reaserching on a navy website I blogged about working on movie and the D.O.D. dep.of defense started emails me saying I needed to be at the pentagon on July 13 2011 as the grandson of William S. White, my grandfather who I was writing movie about. It was a remakes philladephia experiment sci fi. While at pentagon I was asked to be interviewed by the controller of the pentagon film files and archives. Professor Popadopalis liked the plot a verbal trea5ment pitched in 2 minutes no dialog. He said I would be granted access to classified footage I assumed of my grandfather who was no in the Philadelphia experiment . He printed a 16 page report and said we need you to not make it like this movie. He handed me the report the cover page was just u-571.

Anonymous

I didn't even open past the cover page and set the 16 pg navy report down on his desk and guessed that, it's because of the close quarters machine gun fight in side of a submarine scene. He took the pages ripped them in half and tossed them in the garbage. Android if you just make it pro navy and get a budget call us for the footage. I was gonna read the report but my arrogance got the best of me but still can't believe I just knew as the scene in 571 seemed unrealistic and stood out cause no one's gonna fire a machine gun inside of a submarine cause of ricochet.

Anonymous

My long 5ang3ns are to explain that I really know what I am talking about its just long to explain so people can understand a small aspect of the things I am aware of as an autdiatech or self educated person. I chose to learn conspiracy so well I could convince an audience that it's plausible if not historically accurate. In this movie idea japan attacks pearl harbor 2 years later than 1941 in 43 on Dec 7th pearl harbor happens but this time the aircraft carriers are docked and Japan has designed a special bomb to penatrate the armor on the Missouri so the pots think. Infact it's and atom bomb the Germans made as classified the pilots are not told and dropped from low altitude is a suicide mission to the Japanese planes. So many times people say they know about the atom bomb dropped on pearl harbor and I have to reexpain that no atom bomb fell on pearl harbor it's a film plot I'm describing. To many to be normal I can't grasp hoe little people understand d about history and events that are leading to quantum tech. The alternate time line in my film is a quantum possibility and not a reality Einstein uses tesla machine to create a quantum alternative by sending someone back in time to warn him to build the bomb before Germany as telaportation wouldn't stop the destruction of atomic weapons. Thanks for reading. Il habit you up again on some issue I'm sure as you r the most talented artist that knows extremes and what we want to see . I'm a fan of Mucha, Von Bodie, and Parick Nagel. Those 5hree are the best at creating cute women with as few lines as possible. P Nagel did Cheatham wizard with becomes the style that graffiti is based onenitially just copied. P nagal was the playboy cartoonist that drew realisticly and is later in every hair salon in America. Hell I owned print number 276 of the girl on side of the pool. Alfonso Mucha was the master of the cigarette smoking Coca-Cola girl from the turn of the century and sell for 50000 a print. I spotted a wood cot of his but couldn't I'd the print but I told the shop owner I was possative it was Mucha just never printed. I returned to by it 2 weeks later and he was out of business. 2 months later I found out he had bought and moved into a nicer building 2 blocks away. Coincadince? Maybe...I draw really well myself.