Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

An observation from the trenches.

Most of you have been with me long enough to have heard the Three Jaguars line: once you accept money for your art (or craft), you are now selling products, not your creative masterpieces. I spent years pushing that so that creatives understood that once they started selling things, they became businesspeople with products to sell and had to go about their work accordingly.

This is great, and I still believe it to be true. What I didn’t realize was that I hadn't taken it far enough.

In our modern, media-saturated world, art/entertainment/crafts are not just a product—something you package for sale to the market—but a commodity. Which in effect makes them fungible. To put it in plain language: the art that you’re making, the entertainment you’re giving, the hand-crafted perfume or hat you’ve made to put on Etsy, is entirely interchangeable in the market’s eyes with something that fills the same niche.  Take the space opera reader who's picked up my space opera. If I’ve done a good job and there’s another similar book in my backlist waiting for them, they’ll probably move to it because it’s the path of least resistance: “this vendor’s given me a good experience, so it’s a low risk to keep buying her stuff.” But if I don’t have that next book, or if they aren’t in love with what I’ve done, they won’t not buy another book. They will go out, find another book with a spaceship on the cover by some other author, and keep reading.

This is true of every form of entertainment, craft, art. That piece of art someone wants to commission? If you won’t do it, someone else will. That jewelry you wire-wrapped to perfection? Your buyer might have really wanted it but if you overprice it, they'll find a different jeweler whose work they also like to fill that need at their price point. That TV show they were in love with? If it gets canceled, they’ll find something else to watch.

Your offering is replaceable. In the words of Tyler Durden, you are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

It is enough of an existential blow to realize that your art needs to be turned into a business unit that can be measured and sold. To also discover that your creative heart is not going to inspire monogamy in your audience, and that in fact most of them are going to love the one they’re with, is probably over the top terrifying. And yet, that’s the world in which we live.

Now, you will tell me—and you’ll be correct—that there are people for whom a specific artist is irreplaceable. Those people—let’s call them collectors—are rare. Don’t mistake them for people who have favorites. People with favorite artists will preferentially support them, but they’re not going to forgo entertainment or art if they can’t. True collectors who say ‘No, I will spend no money until I have enough to purchase this particular artist’s work’ or ‘everything else is trash, so I’m not going to bother with it’… well. I think I know one. (A friend of mine is a Tolkien fan, and it broke the genre for him. He no longer reads fantasy. He re-reads Tolkien every few years.)

Most makers-of-things will have a small core of fans (people who think of that maker as a favorite). They might, if they’re lucky, attract a collector or two. But any other sales, if sales they make, are going to be a broad and undiscriminating consumer base….and before you tell me that sounds awful, I’ll make it clear that I am one of those broad and undiscriminating consumers with a few favorites (and you probably are too!). This is not some rare thing. It’s not even a bad thing. It’s just how things are. There’s so much media to be consumed that you need never be bored. My kindle is never empty. And if my favorite author doesn’t have a book out? There are thousands of books being written by people who want to write similar books, and while it's not a great substitute it'll tide me over.

The point of this, then, is this: operating in a commodity market requires different behavior. Success is less about the quality and exclusivity of your product and more about its predictability and volume. The creative market’s been moving this way for a while, but I think the signs are obvious that we’re there, and that means if you want to get by, you have to be: 1. Fast. And 2. Consistent. By which I mean you have to make a lot of whatever you’re making, and it has to be enough like the things you’ve made before that people know what to expect. For best effect, it should also be a lot like other things people already like.

In some ways, this is the freest creative folks have ever been to pursue their livelihoods and get their products to market. But millions of people have seized that freedom, and the result is that we all need to figure out how to pivot to serve an oversaturated market with a limited budget.

This is not meant to be depressing—I'm not depressed! I am thinking out loud. I’ve been working up to this epiphany for a while. But part of my commitment to my work involves the willingness to look difficult problems in the eye, and this one... this one is pretty rough. The market is only going to get more saturated as time passes.

So  what I do with this new epiphany? No clue. Share it with you, in the hopes that it’ll help some of you figure out how to succeed, why you’re failing, or why you’d prefer to keep a day job. And also, to listen to suggestions and comments, because you all always have something interesting to tell me. :)

Comments

Anonymous

I have long suspected this.

mcahogarth

*puzzled* Why should this make you inadequate? Your ability to sell is absolutely no reflection on your art's value. In fact, those things have almost no correlation at all...!

Anonymous

Aaahh, sorry, probably my brain problems talking more than reality.

Anonymous

I should clarify that I was thinking less about the value of my art (which, since my husband likes it, and as a child I knew that I just wanted to give the joy of stories to at least one person, is already a great success!) than about my effectiveness as a businessperson.

Laura Murray

How strange. I think Patreon knows it's there -- it tells me it's loaded n of n+1 comments -- but there's no other sign of it. At any rate when it disappeared I worried it had come off as a serious offense and not "here is a really unreasonable thing I had to tell myself to stop thinking."

Laura Murray

And now this one isn't showing as threaded! *flings up hands* I need more practice making Patreon comments, evidently.

mcahogarth

No, I wasn't offended! A little chagrined, maybe, but not offended. But feelings aren't rational, and understanding that makes it a little easier. :) And it's not you. Patreon's comment system is the pits. I've told them so repeatedly, in the hopes they'll do something about it. (Ironically they have a creator sandbox forum that has AMAZING comment tools, so I don't understand why they don't just port it.)

Laura Murray

I do miss your LJ, I admit! But rationally I understand that it used to make sense to have it, I was fortunate enough to find your work when it was available (via Kherishdar, I think), and later it became more trouble than it was worth to you. Nor am I under the illusion that any one customer makes the kind of individual contribution an author does! Thank you for the assurance that the comments may be technically weird regardless of what I do.

mcahogarth

LJ was good times, back when it was good. The participation rates were falling off pretty hard though; I remember when serials used to get 60-100 comments a post! And by the time I left I was happy if I got 10. People were already leaving the platform. (And now, of course, it's been shot by the new terms of service.) I do miss it too! My reasons for leaving were more complex than it being more trouble than it was worth, but I don't like talking excessively about my own problems so I don't really go into it. I prefer solving things, if I can. And I was grateful Patreon solved a couple of my problems, and gave me a platform to use for a similar purpose. (And amazing fans to set up a fund to allow people access to it.) :)

Rex Schrader

I don't know if I'm unusual as a consumer, but I do tend to enjoy 'Indie' authors such as yourself more not just because I'm looking for a "Space Opera" or an "Anthropomorphic Animals" story, but for a Space Opera that isn't like the 1000 others on the market. I like Indie artists who bring something new to the table or give a different take on the story. I've read enough space opera that I'm kinda bored to death with the conventions of the genre. I think that may be where an artist can differentiate. Unlike Etsy, you can't just pull a genre defying novel out of your back pocket. You need to have some specific skills and a certain worldview. I do agree with the rest of your assessment, though. When I look at my reading habits - lots of web serials (I must be reading 10 at once), indie authors galore . . . they're just a way to pass the time. Maybe "quirky indie novel" is just another commodity? Cute lunchbag art does seem to be a bonus, though. ;)

Anonymous

Data point: I saw the comment briefly, but when I went to reply it was gone.

Anonymous

As a reader in this age of endless content, I actually find myself clinging desperately to my favorite authors. So many times I click on a book that looks good only to find that it isn't my cup of tea, or it was self-published without the help of an editor... and I don't read as much as I used to, so I'm pickier. I'm actually re-reading a series right now because I KNOW it will be a good experience.

A. N. Hyatt

I take a contrary view (says the Libra LOL) in that with the market being so saturated that yes, have consistent work available, but focus more on that one thing that makes you crazy and that you're pretty sure you're the only one who'll want it. As Po says in Kung Fu Panda 3, be the best You that You can be. Now, having said that, I know how hard it is. It's just the observation I've been having as I throw myself *more* into the work that I consider my strangest and most me and how it's getting far more support than anything I ever have created before. That being said, your mileage may totally vary.

mcahogarth

I am glad it works for you! I have years of data now that indicate it doesn't work for me... at all. Lol. :)

mcahogarth

I totally think that the indie market has made it possible to publish quirky books! And for niche readers to find them. But my observation is that it's rare for niche readers to be able to buy in numbers sufficient to support a creator. You can differentiate these days, and find the people who want exactly what you make, but the more narrow your product's audience, the less likely you'll be able to live off it. Those handful of niche readers will be really grateful, though. :)

A. N. Hyatt

LOL indeed! Isn't it funny/weird how that works? So much of this business is luck or something. Baffles me.

Anonymous

This touches on one reason I think it's so important in this market to be cooperative, rather than competitive; your market isn't exclusively YOUR market. Thinking that you can single-handedly keep your customer from spending money on anyone else will only isolate you and make you start to feel like a machine. I love recommending my friends' work, and I've never felt like I've lost customers because of it. Quite the opposite, when I don't have anything new of my own to share, sharing someone else's work not only helps a friend, the customer remembers my name as well as theirs, keeping it fresh in their memory and making them more likely to buy when I DO have something available.

Anonymous

I should also add that I'm part of a group pseudonym that releases fiction not quite every week. Part of our shared success is that fast and consistent thing you've observed. None of us alone could meet that kind schedule, but spread out amoung 20+ people, it's been crazy-successful. Each of us writes at our own pace, and does our own advertising, there's some shared promotion (mostly just a mailing list), and it's been a lot of fun and profit.

Anonymous

Perhaps the best thing to do is make sure we, as creators, have a broad set of interests. We might not be able to create our favorite things all the time, but we might be able to get away with usually being able to do things we like. This is why, on my Twitch channel, I don't just play any one game. There are fans of that game, and some may not come if I don't play Their Favorite Game, but I have more viewers overall if I switch it up regularly. I end up with that group of people who you mention--people who watch my show because of me, not because of what I'm playing. In general, when we create art that says "I care about you," that's when we win. That's when you've won. I've observed sometimes you reach markets because your writing speaks to the Neglected. There's always a risk, though, of simply telling people what they want to hear to get them to buy things...and there are a growing number of people who think they don't need anyone to care about them at all(or are at least tired of being lied to by big corporations). I think you can still be You and apply your You to a wide variety of specific audiences. Diversification can be a good thing...as long as your work speaks the Truth. That's what people need most.

Godel Fishbreath

This looks neither left nor right but simply sensible. Thanks.

Anonymous (edited)

Comment edits

2023-02-20 23:19:31 Technology is such a powerful deflationary force, & commoditization goes with that. Even the medical & legal professions will start to feel that soon. I think content providers choose to go an inch deep & a mile wide (speed, consistency) or go a mile deep & an inch wide (hyper-targeted to a cultivated list who are rabid fans). Sellers of physical products have made similar choices for decades. It's the difference between Hershey's and Godiva, Wal-Mart & Nordstrom. Products succeed much more easily if they can leverage brand building principals to keep from staying a commodity, including authors. There are strategies to accomplish this. Sally Hogshead's book "Fascinate" helped me understand them, not that I have the implementation down yet.
2017-04-13 13:03:48 Technology is such a powerful deflationary force, & commoditization goes with that. Even the medical & legal professions will start to feel that soon. I think content providers choose to go an inch deep & a mile wide (speed, consistency) or go a mile deep & an inch wide (hyper-targeted to a cultivated list who are rabid fans). Sellers of physical products have made similar choices for decades. It's the difference between Hershey's and Godiva, Wal-Mart & Nordstrom. Products succeed much more easily if they can leverage brand building principals to keep from staying a commodity, including authors. There are strategies to accomplish this. Sally Hogshead's book "Fascinate" helped me understand them, not that I have the implementation down yet.

Technology is such a powerful deflationary force, & commoditization goes with that. Even the medical & legal professions will start to feel that soon. I think content providers choose to go an inch deep & a mile wide (speed, consistency) or go a mile deep & an inch wide (hyper-targeted to a cultivated list who are rabid fans). Sellers of physical products have made similar choices for decades. It's the difference between Hershey's and Godiva, Wal-Mart & Nordstrom. Products succeed much more easily if they can leverage brand building principals to keep from staying a commodity, including authors. There are strategies to accomplish this. Sally Hogshead's book "Fascinate" helped me understand them, not that I have the implementation down yet.