Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Our first Wonka 2.4 behind -the- scenes post! This is design work on a mysterious mannequin who is in this issue. Putting some thought into the lingerie it is wearing and its looks - should it have hair? should it have arms- what is the best position for the arms to be stuck in? I've already noticed something I forgot to add in, but i'll let that be a surprise.

And as for the lingerie/underwear- what color? how unusual should it be? should it not be underwear- should it be tiny/ super revealing clothes?

All these are things i'm thinking about- if you want to offer your thoughts or answer a question, leave a comment and it might help me decide or re-think something...

Files

Comments

Kuro7

Hmmm. Interesting! Maybe you could her a thin tight tube top that has the "Wonka Candy" logo on it as well as give her a tight, short mini-skirt. And make the colors of her clothes or underwear, whichever you decide, the same colors that Wendy Wonka is wearing: pink and light blue.

Jeff

I think the mannequin should have hair, we’ll know it’s a mannequin and I think the hair makes it look like it used to be human. The pose could be a sexy pose, two hands on her butt. Or one hand on her hip and the other hanging down her side. Maybe a Princess Leia pose? I think the lingerie could have something on the legs, mannequins are used to show off clothing so I think there should be a balance on skimpy and material.

Anonymous

something like that is absolutely not mine. ≡(▔﹏▔)≡

MallMannequin

Oh man I love mannequins. I would say keep arms. Depending on what you're trying to accomplish you want people to relate to it on some level. I'd say the colors you have there are already plenty evocative. I personally like it to be sexy but not so revealing. That way you can lose more as you go.