Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Good morning to all our Founders. Thank you for your continued support. Just n update and a chance to chime in on next targets. I tasked out a market sentiment target to see when the market is going to rebound. I'm still waiting back on data from Dick and Rock, the target is due today but I did get back Daz's session. I posted one of the maps he drew and tried to align it as it would continue throughout the timeline he depicted. 

Daz did add a disclaimer to this session that this was the FIRST time he had ever attempted this type of session so he just put out what he was seeing and feeling. 

I'm waiting to see if I get back charts from Dick and Rock, so lets see how they match up to this one. IF Daz's chart is correct and I have aligned it properly, then does this mean we WON'T break the $750 billion market cap like we did in 2017? This is what I had asked myself and decided to look at some additional targets to either support or disprove this session data. 

We all know about the BTC & LTC bull run supposed to be at the end of this year again. This is well documented by Clif High's reporting about $100k BTC parties. Is THIS true? I don't know but it gives us an opportunity to validate some of this data with further session targets. 

We know that with some targets, for example the LTC report where the team hit LTC above $3k by December of this year. Exciting, yes, but accurate? Let's see. This first session was done using ARV, so were the results as accurate as CRV? I'd like to test these and need to get some group consensus on how to approach this. 

CRV as a remote viewing method will work great to measure sentiment of let say the emotional value of the employees or CEO of a coin/token/project. So since there is no TRUE CEO of BTC, how do we best measure this? What targeting would be most appropriate? I was thinking about an ARV to CRV comparison of market cap for DEC 18. 

Then I was going to revisit the LTC ARV session with another ARV session in the same timeframe to see if we're still on course or has something changed. 

I am engaging only the Founders for this since you have faithfully given your support. I can't ask the viewers since that would be front loading. Sooo, lets have a chat shall we? 

I've got to issue this next target by tomorrow so lets discuss today. Please provide your thought. I can also post a poll if we get a few options to have the Founders vote on. 

Sounds good? Let me know. 

Thanks in advance,

Ed @ HQ. 



Files

Comments

Anonymous

I think you could remote view one of us. I know that I have specific plans to do certain things that depend on the market and what it does around the first of the year. I also believe that by remote viewing a founder the results would be better than by picking someone already that is public and has already made a fortune with cryptocurrency. Just a thought

Anonymous

It can be a good idea to counter check the prediction. I support.

Anonymous

The first suggestion makes sense. As long as there are no life altering events for that person though. Also,

JD

Yes, a confirmation would be good. On another note, has DigiByte been added to the list as coins to be viewed in the near future. Clif's data has significant showing something may be happening beyond this most recent move.

Anonymous

Bitcoin (BTC) has been an excellent measure of market sentiment to date, so targeting that coin in December should give us a good idea of Crypto short term future. Range: < $6k, $6 - $20K, and >$20k. If the viewers each came up with the same range I would consider that to be valuable market intelligence.

Anonymous

The same could be attempted with 3 targets ranges on the Market Cap, as you suggest. This would be just as useful to me. Cheers

cryptoviewing

Given what has been forcasted I'd probalby be more inclined to use values such as: < $10k $10K - $40K or >$40K this way this breaks our segments into more reasonable bands since we already hit 20k last year. The expectation is to have BTC at least hit the same. But based on Daz's chart, we'll see. Sounds fair?

Anonymous

The selection of price ranges/bands is tricky without parameters to work by. As I see it this is an experiment to determine whether RV can be developed and used as a reliable tool for crypto price prediction. I think that should be a guiding principle in the selection of targets, and how they are to be viewed. If you were to select the BTC price in the December time frame as the target, then my approach would be an 'if..........then' i.e. If the viewers convincingly select +$20k, Then you task them to look at that band in greater detail.........$20 -$40, $40 - $60, >$60K. If there is no concensus in the first viewing, then task the viewers to repeat the target. I say these things without knowing what constraints you are working under, and only as a suggestion. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the discussion.

Anonymous

Not sure where to request coins to be viewed but I would LOVE to see WAN chain (first choice) also VET (formerly VEN) and ICX, the three coins of the "interoperability alliance"