Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Here's the analysis on the SEPT 2018 EOS Remote Viewing session that Dick, Daz and Rock did. We had two plausible conclusions from the data. We decided to have the team take another deep dive into the token/project and come back with another set of sessions for December 2018.  We will be publishing the December EOS session during the week along with Dick and Mike's analysis.

Files

(No title)

Comments

Anonymous

I can see that it is important to have very dissimilar photographs.

Anonymous

Yes, too bad the pictures had too many aspects that were the same. It's not possible to know which one was the correct one.

Anonymous

When I trained in HARV , Hybrid Associative RV, with Maj. Dames. We only did 1/3 of an RV session up to s4(x) and stopped. If we went further, we would get bleed-over from the other targets within the cue. Therefore, in this type of decision making RV, the first contact with the target is the richest and most reliable data. In other words, the longer you stay, the more bleed-over you get. Also, those three photos have too much in common. Just my thoughts..

cryptoviewing

Yes that was a conclusion we had after the analysis. We plan to revisit with a new set if completely dissimilar targets.

Anonymous

Targets: Bookcase full of books; planet Juniper; Bicycle

Anonymous

Dick, i saw the session you did years ago about a Tsunami maybe hitting Hawaii and i sent you an email asking if i should move. Good thing it happened somewhere else! I've been following you ever since.

Anonymous

@ the very least we still know its gonna climb though so

Anonymous

you guys kept seeing this triangle shape, very much looks like the EOS symbol itself. Good effort though.

Anonymous

Also, giant circular rolls of paper and the Olympic rings - too similar. I saw that immediately - no good.

Anonymous

Guys really?? I could have selected better targets. This is very poor target selection considering who did it. And then trying to convince the viewer? Big no-no. There is the falcon heavy start, a baby suckling, a bunch of flowers. No way to mix up those. Took me 5 seconds. I give this a one-star! Plus: a coin currently between 15 and 18 US$ should get a somewhat smaller spacing. 1-40, 41-80, over 80 maybe.

cryptoviewing

This was completely my fault. I was advised on structuring better targets and now I have more clear picture on the differences we need to properly distinguish these. Not on the guys at all, the VERI report has more differences and will have better feedback. A learning process.

cryptoviewing

Agreed. My novice mistake Gunnar. No doubt. We're bringing on a professional targeter who has worked with Dick for 30 yrs. This won't happen again. Ed

cryptoviewing

Agreed, we're working on the process, my newbie mistake. We've got a new targeter on and will not allow this to happen again. Regards, Ed

Anonymous

I keep trying to play the video but it says that it is refusing to connect

Anonymous

If you are using firefox try chrome. I have the same prob with my firefox.

Anonymous

It’s okay. It’s a learning process. You’ll target better next time. This is an experiment. It takes time to work out all the kinks.

Anonymous

agree. each picture has to be completely different in their shapes, smell, energy and 'type' ie factory vs forest vs dog

Anonymous

Also, EOS could easily hit all 3 of those target prices in one month. We've seen many cryptos do it.

Anonymous

Maybe try to tweak the crypto price range. Maybe try to hit tops or bottoms? Or an average price? Or, the price compared to BTC. Trying to hit the top might be the way to go, "What will the highest price of EOS be within the 4th quarter of 2018?" That gives you a precise goal.

Anonymous

I have 500 hi res pictures I put together for APP for targets. I can email or Dropbox them to whomever. (Bike race, cherry pie, set of knives, blue frog - the types of images that only have one specific thing going on like Gunnar describes). Nice work guys... as someone who ARV's I'd have to say Dick's had the least bleed-through.

Anonymous

I really appreciate your work here, and I agree with Nathan regarding timeframe. Perhaps the time viewed could be narrowed to one date like you did with Litecoin as I could see EOS hitting the ranges all 3 viewers saw during a one-month span if you’ve caught it when it was riding or falling quickly.

Anonymous

It’s poorly tasked and reduce the credit ability of the overall viewing. Watch FARSIGHT stuff enough and noticed this seems having bias . By the way r of all of you holding EOS directly and indirectly like a shared portfolio . Is it something that can be disclosed

cryptoviewing

No one to my knowledge is holding EOS. We are revisiting this brief and will re publish the data. This was all on me since I am not a seasoned tasker, I learning but the team got an extreme amount of resolution on this. Please keep in mind these are always blind targets and no front loading period. So there is zero bias in the viewing. We are getting a seasoned tasker on board to handle that aspect and then Michael and I will run the analysis on the output. This way we are not involved in the process as Dick mentions and will not have any outside bias influence results.

Anonymous

You need to pick a day, not a month. Loving the work so far. Looking forward to veritaseum and hopefully theta viewings.

Anonymous

Thank you for your time and efforts. Remember everyone... this is an experiment !!! Cheers

Anonymous

Thanks Dick. We love you guys. this is exciting. easier targets probly work best. Apple, hammer, mountain. Thoughts?

Anonymous

Awesome stuff gentlemen. Thank you so much.

Anonymous

👍👍👍 Wonderful work but all the targets share lots of the end same scenarios, all of the targets in there working envoroments are luminated. They all deal with people around them. Thus we have all scene these cryptos with crazy spikes in price. So this session was a so so. But I love rv. work lots of potential. I still believe in the gut throw up feeling I get. When I'm reading and something out of the blue is forcing me to look at something Else. We all have it a random thought earlier in the day. And we see what it meant later that night. Go with your gut flow. LOL have a good day to all my crypto brothers and sisters

Anonymous

Interesting experiment. I'm not convinced that the drawings accurately picked out a picture. I don't have any EOS so not wanting it to go a certain way. Perhaps you need a fourth picture with no target to compare responses.

Anonymous

Another issue may be the targeting: the final target has a number as top value, I would suggest you leave that open, so not 251-500 but instead "above 251", that way there is no confusion should the coin hit 501. And there should be some common sense in assignig the values. Currently at 15 the EOS total value is 14 billion, should it ever rise to 500 that would represent 182 billion, a value higher than the Bitcoin at 157. NOT very likely. So 1-40, 41-80, above 80 are much more sensible i.e. likely targets.

Anonymous

Hope that the team does a good post-mortem on this. You need to consider how you handled the price ranges, dates, and, of course, targets. I have a question: is there any way the actual sessions could be made available in PDF (when they were done on paper)? I get the feeling that an experienced viewer mixed with someone who knows something about cryptos might catch something.

Anonymous

Great to be member of Crypto Viewing. Love the work.

Anonymous

To my understanding, remote viewing is able to calculate the sum of current forces acting on the EOS price as of now. If an investor that has the capability and the intention to buy EOS and is declaring to himself I will buy EOS in his/her certain conditions(price getting low, price getting high) or if a person has sub-conscious affinity to EOS and would buy it also if his conditions are met, I believe RV calculates this into the result. Same with investors with the intent of selling. If an institution has finalized a buy or a sell decision with limit price secret, we are able to see it in the RV result. I do not believe distant future can be known or read. My deduction from the session above is price of EOS for September has not "solidified". When Daz was doing his session the sum of all forces acting on the price of EOS was moving towards the target 1. When other viewers did their sessions the RV result was moving to target picture 3.

cryptoviewing

Again, this was an oversight on my part not the viewers. It wont happen again but as always we thank you for your support!

Anonymous

It's hard to not be disappointed here, everyone makes a mistake once in a while that's ok. But If I were in your team I wouldn't have published that result as it's clearly a newbie mistake. Especially when you ask people to pay for it.

cryptoviewing

Update is already published. Check for the Dec briefing.

Anonymous

hmm, basically it could be anything on the price. no clear answer.

Anonymous

So the price range is between $1.00 and $500.00? Come on people, we need more sensible information to justify $20.00 subscription per month, sorry!

Anonymous

WHY ARE YOU FOCUSING ON EOS? WHY NOT USE YOUR TIME AND OUR MEMBERSHIP ON MORE CONSTRUCTIVE IDEAS LIKE RV FOR MAJOUR INCOMING FUD AND PULL BACKS AND THE NEXT BULL RUN? THIS WILL HELP US ALL ! RV EOS, YOU MAY AS WELL RV POTATO COIN........ OR SPANK COIN.....

cryptoviewing

Well actually it IS very possible IF BTC doubles or triples the current market cap. Worldwide market is probably $70 trillion. US alone is $30. With only 2% of the people using it now... Think about it. These numbers aren't out of the realm of possibility if the adoption rate increases signifcantly which it will in the coming months and years. Once the bank failures begin (very soon) this will create the "Problem" which will need a "Solution."

Anonymous

easy george

Anonymous

listening to the interview, there is a danger of confirmation bias, people really want the high prices. Daz sticks to his guns though which is great. Agree has to be done by a 3rd party

Anonymous

Just a thought about Daz's interpretations of his session - his two major gestalts were "circles" in "motion". Yes, the paper rolls were at one point in motion to get to that state, but they aren't in motion in the picture, whereas the Olympic circles literally have motion intertwined with them (the fireworks). Daz also associated the circles with being in an engine - engines run on sparks. Also, Rock's circles are all elevated.

Anonymous

I guess the target were ambiguous, EOS never got above 16.00$·

Anonymous

but the target reveal should be after interpreting the data, otherwise knowing the target can affect the analisys