Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

As you’ve seen on WWE television of late, WWE has been making an effort to streamline their championships.

This past week, Asuka was given a new championship belt that looked like Roman Reigns’ new championship belt, but with a white strap. The name of the title belt was changed, with a WWE source confirming the obvious, that it was to clean up the Smackdown/Raw Championship situation that was muddied due to the draft. They also said that they wanted Asuka’s title to look like Reigns’ to help portray it on an even plane, as has been the case for the past several years. We’re told that Rhea Ripley’s championship will be receiving some other sort of adjustment as well, either in name or appearance.

As reported previously, the idea to unify the WWE and Universal Titles were only combined when Roman Reigns was sidelined after Reigns got COVID ahead of WWE Day 1 2021. There were some internal plans last Summer and Fall to have the titles separated again by WrestleMania 39, but those ended up getting nixed. However, shortly after WrestleMania, firm plans were made to split the titles and have Raw with its own championship.

A WWE source has claimed to Fightful that technically the Universal and WWE Championship “histories” are still separate, but said that they believe the WWE Title’s history will be continued once Reigns loses the championship, whenever that may be.

The Women’s Tag Team Titles are being combined, and there were several in NXT at the time of the formation of the NXT Tag Team Titles that were confused why they were being created in the first place. However, Fightful was told there were plans in order to combine the NXT and WWE Women’s tag titles going back to April when the WWE Draft occurred. We’ve been told that the WWE Women’s Tag Titles will appear on NXT programming when needed as was the original plan for the WWE Women’s Tag Team Titles. WWE sources indicated to us that this unification would have moved forward quicker, if not for the unfortunate injuries within the division.

One point of frustration we heard from WWE sources was a simple misuse of the term “undisputed” in two cases. Roman Reigns’ title is being referred to as an undisputed title despite Seth Rollins being a world champion. Asuka’s new championship has “undisputed” on the front of it, despite Rhea Ripley also being a women’s champion. One higher up in WWE said “that’s admittedly confusing. I don’t know why there is an insistence on doing that, and a lot of people have brought that up and it’s been dismissed.”

Comments

Terron Riddick

So I could see Rhea getting a version of Seth’s title on Monday, and they call it the Women’s World Championship

Matthew Brownlee

With the Undisputed Title I can kinda understand it since Roman still has the legacy of both titles and you really don't want to put WWE Universal Champion behest because that would mean the WWE Title wouldn't be recognized, and vice versa and nobody is being called the WWE Double Champion so I can let that name slide for Roman. Asuka though? If your being called WWE Women's Champion, then why don't you just keep Women's Championship belt and change the colors? You didn't need to put Undisputed. That make no actual sense, especially if your going to completely change Rhea new belt to look like Seths and call her Women's World Champion or World Women's Champion, whichever... And if you plan on changing the name back to the WWE Championship and keep the Universal part out as soon as Roman has it, which will probably also be a whole new women's design...