Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

(A draft of this writing appeared on my Twitter today.)

This screen capture of a Twitter thread found its way in front of my eyeballs this afternoon and I can't stop thinking about it.

Like... WHY does this person think God  wouldn't send you wet dreams?  If you believe humans are made in god's image, which includes having a  body that orgasms, shouldn't wet dreams be seen as a divine act? Seems like a pretty heavenly gift to me! Like, dude, God loves you so friggin' much that they sent you a moment of pure physical pleasure out of the blue, for no reason.

Personally, I'm agnostic. 

I WISH I believed in a higher power, I think life would be a little less scary if I did. I remember the exact day I began the process of losing my faith. My  suuuper religious cousins and I were talking about how God made the world. We were probably about... ten-ish years old? I was of the mind that God created all the life on earth through evolution. I thought time worked differently for God than for humans, seven days to God was millions of years to humans. We were in the back seat of my aunt's car and she turned around to tell  me "You can't go to heaven if you believe in evolution, Erika." 

I was just so stunned and hurt and I felt like I had done something wrong. And it felt so profoundly unfair!!! I could go to church and accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior and generally try to be as good a person as I could be and God would send me to hell just because evolution sounded pretty reasonable to me??? I don't remember if I cried in front of them, but I did cry when my dad  picked me up. I really thought I was going to hell for this. 

My dad explained that every single person interprets religion and God differently, they each have their own set of rules. And that's how I realized oh, wait, these aren't GOD'S divine orders, they're HUMANS making up these rules to fit their own purposes. I didn't stop believing that instant, but that was the start of my questioning. Haha, in trying to save my soul from hell, my aunt's intervention ultimately resulted in me losing my faith all together. THANKS, AUNT BONNIE.

The moral of the story is: if God is real, I'm pretty sure they're responsible for evolution and wet dreams.

Files

Comments

Anonymous

One of the cooler things about being a Reconstrutionist Jew — <a href="https://jewishrecon.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://jewishrecon.org/</a> — is that the question of G_d’s existence or otherwise is as on the table as any other question. I’m an atheist for all normative values of the word ‘G_d’. But the narrative and social value of divinity as an idea doesn’t go away just because the idea is wholly imagined. When Leonard Cohen, for example, wrote — Ring the bells that still can ring Forget your perfect offering There is a crack, a crack, in everything That’s how the light gets in ‘Anthem’, *The Future*, 1992 — he was referencing the Kabbalistic creation myth. The divine had withdraw into itself and then explode outward in order to create the universe (yes, 16th century Jewish mystics were accidentally pre-figuring the Big Bang theory). The process itself ‘broke’ reality, leaving everything slightly broken or cracked. And that brokenness is why the universe exists. And it’s the only way we can apprehend both the creation and the idea of a creator. This same story, BTW, is the source of the idea of ‘tikkun olam’, routinely translated as ‘repair the world’. By doing the right thing — by ourselves, by each other, and by the larger universe — we do the only thing that makes a connection between the real and divine possible. There’s no supernatural reward for ‘being good’, just the knowledge that you’ve made reality a little better for your labour. All of which is a narrative framework that, for me at least, keeps divinity on the ‘useful and worthwhile’ side of things. It’s external reality or otherwise is irrelevant to this story’s social and ethical utility. Also, on the question of pleasure. In the Talmud (Yerushalmi Kiddushin 4:12, to be precise) it says: ר' חזקיה ר' כהן בשם רב עתיד אדם ליתן דין וחשבון על כל מה שראת עינו ולא אכל רבי לעזר חשש להדא שמועתא ומצמית ליה פריטין ואכיל בהון מכל מילה חדא בשתא R Chizkiah R Cohn in the name of Rav: In the future one will be judged for all that their eyes saw and they didn’t eat. R Lazer worried about this opinion and set aside money to eat from every kind once a year. The Korban HaEida and the P’nei Moshe both take the position that Cohn’s larger point is that to make oneself suffer by refusing to enjoy something is forbidden. That is, Cohn is not arguing for indulgence but against asceticism. If you can enjoy something, and you want to do so, it is an active wrong to not, then, enjoy that something. And, yes, this is one of the many sources in Jewish thinking that argue for sexual pleasure being not just a good and worthy thing, but a holy thing. One of the grounds for divorce, for example, is a husband being unable or unwilling to provide his wife with adequate and satisfactory orgasms. And the holiest night of the week — Erev Shabbat — is best marked by couples schtupping. Because, so far as Jewish tradition is concerned, the best way of honouring divinity on the most important night of the week is to make each other cum.

Anonymous

oh my lord... *bangs head on desk*