Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content

Hey Patrons!

Great to see lots of you on the live stream for Scout's launch the other day! Thank you again for all the patience in getting that flight off the ground. Given how much worked right off the bat with this flight here, I'd say it was worth the wait :)

This is all the raw footage from the flight, plus about 40 minutes of looking through the data that was recorded onboard. There's a lot to look through, so I'll summarize quickly here, and you can watch the whole review if you'd like more details!

As far as the data goes, it looks like the Kalman filter on AVA's NAV computer is what gave us that slide near the end. I break it down in the video, but the filter is off by a solid 1m/s on the Y axis velocity estimate at the end of landing. The controller worked great, actually, but the measurements/estimates on how fast we were sliding were off. 

I'm also not going to write off a set of pointy ends on the landing feet. Nothing that would truly jam it in the ground, but something so we stop bouncing up. Perhaps a little aluminum crunch zone! The stakes are too high to try landing on concrete, and though the bounce is better now, it still exists. Might end up building a test rig to find a nice solution before the next flight.

I anticipate that we'll fly again in December, I just need a bit of time to nail down the bugs I found on this flight :)

Blue skies,

Joe

Files

Scout Flight 1 - All Footage + Data Review

Help support BPS.space: https://www.patreon.com/bps_space Second channel, mostly for KSP: https://www.youtube.com/user/musicmakr For more info: https://twitter.com/joebarnard https://twitter.com/bps_space https://www.instagram.com/bps.space/ https://www.facebook.com/bps.space/ http://www.bps.space

Comments

Anonymous

Nice! Look forward to watching it later.

Anonymous

Hey Joe! I'm not sure how much stress you've been feeling from people on various YouTube and whatever streams talking about delays or whatnot, but I for one support your channel because your incremental design and upgrade methodology *itself* is what I find fascinating. Your step-by-step process, for all of your projects, from sticking a landing to designing a launch pad, to even the 20-20 aluminum motor test-stand you built are all fantastic examples of the kind of engineering individuals can accomplish if they prioritize their goals and engineer incrementally to maximize the chances of success, while also maximizing the amount of data they can obtain during their tests. (And I'm not even getting into Sprite, and the insane levels of work that went into getting that project so successful. I really don't think people give you enough credit for that.) Watching that process, and being a part of that process in our own small way, is a big reason I think a lot of us support you. we are not looking for some giant payoff where you land a rocket. Let's be honest, other groups have landed bigger rockets (well SpaceX has, and I'm thinking Rocket Lab is going to yank one out of the sky by the end of next year, but you get the point), our support is, I think, based on the enjoyment we get from watching your methodology itself, and how that methodology allows amateurs like ourselves to achieve goals that in most cases people wouldn't believe possible from anything but the largest engineering institutions. So please don't stress, don't feel the need to apologize to anybody, just keep doing you, and understand that you yourself, and the careful and methodical planning, testing, and simulating you share with us are the real reasons we are so happy to support you.

Anonymous

Have you thought of a very simple RF box around AVA to help with GPS noise?

Anonymous

You're doing a great job! Is it an idea to focus on the nav task, and leave the gear changes for when you're confident the lander has full landing control? Sidequestion: why do you fold in the fins while landing? Does this not influence the flight characteristics unnecessarily?

Anonymous

Awesome Joe! It was worth the wait :)

Anonymous

That was very cool!

Anonymous

Hey Joe, I know you said no thrust diversion, .. maybe a iris shutter added to the TVC could do the trick. Just an idea! May also be a cover to avoid unintentional ignition of the descent motor by the delay charge of the ascent one.