Home Artists Posts Import Register

Content


Regulators at the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) have asked banks interested in acquiring failed lenders Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank to submit bids by March 17, and any buyer of Signature must agree to give up all the crypto business at the bank.


March 15 (Reuters) - Regulators at the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) have asked banks interested in acquiring failed lenders Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank to submit bids by March 17, people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.The new auctions show how the FDIC is making a concerted effort to return the lenders to the private sector after regulators took over Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) last Friday and Signature Bank (SBNY.O) on Sunday, during a weekend of turmoil that has reverberated through the global financial system.Advertisement · Scroll to continueReport an adThis will be the FDIC's second attempt at selling SVB after a failed effort on Sunday. The FDIC has since retained investment bank Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR.N) to run a new auction, the sources sai

Register nowRegister for free to Reuters and know the full story
The FDIC is aiming to sell both SVB and Signature in their entirety, while offers for parts of the banks could be considered if whole company sales do not happen, two of the sources said.Only bidders with an existing bank charter will be allowed to study the banks' financials ahead of submitting their offer, a move which is aimed at giving traditional lenders an advantage over private equity firms, the two sources said.


The two sources added that any buyer of Signature must agree to give up all the crypto business at the bank. But an FDIC spokesperson told Reuters after publication that the agency would not require divestment of crypto activities as part of any sale, and pointed to prior comments from FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg that the agency is not looking to prohibit any particular activity by banks.The sources requested anonymity because the matter is confidential. Signature and Piper Sandler did not immediately respond to requests for comment.Advertisement · Scroll to continueReport an adU.S. President Joseph Biden has said that U.S. taxpayers will not bear the cost of salvaging SVB and Signature because any capital shortfalls would be covered by a government fund that can place a levy on other banks. Successful sales, however, would help minimize such shortfalls.SVB became last week the biggest U.S. bank to fail since the 2008 financial crisis, spreading jitters across the banking sector and raising doubt about the future of startups that turned to the technology-focused lender for financial services.Among the banks that studied but decided against an offer during last weekend's auction for SVB were PNC Financial Services (PNC.N) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO), which owns California-focused lender City National Bank, Reuters has reported.SVB Financial Group (SIVB.O), the former parent of SVB, is exploring seeking bankruptcy protection as one option for selling its remaining assets, which include an investment bank and a venture capital business, Reuters reported on Wednesday.Signature Bank was shuttered due to "a significant crisis of confidence in the bank's leadership," the New York financial regulator said on Tuesday. The bank was well known in the crypto space, and at the end of September almost a quarter of its deposits came from the cryptocurrency sector

Files

Exclusive: U.S. regulator taps Piper Sandler in new bid to sell Silicon Valley Bank -sources

March 15 (Reuters) - Regulators at the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) have tapped investment bank Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR.N) to relaunch the auction of failed lender Silicon Valley Bank, people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

Comments

Anonymous

Well if I didn’t have a family I’d be voting with my feet!🥰

Anonymous

If true, the us has a communistic governement , not democratic.

Anonymous

Regardless of how you may feel about Glen Beck, he can be seen in this video explaining the context of the recent bank collapse and govt targets crypto friendly banks. https://www.glennbeck.com/specials/how-they-ll-use-the-banking-crisis-to-control-you-glenn-tv Please watch from the beginning, and if you're pressed for time, jump to fhe 26:00 minute mark. This is where he starts to mention cryptocurrency, and the picture he paints leaves me with real concern as to the future of crypto as we know it. I highly recommend watching and I would like to know if you think his warnings are over the top, because I for one, do not. I didn't know that other banks had collapsed. Furthermore, that THE BANKS INVOLVED IN CRYPTO WERE TARGETED and The FULL FORCE OF GOVT IS BEING WEILDED TO STRIKE DOWN ANY OPPOSING CRYPTO THAT WILL THREATEN CBDC. Don't worry, its onlyn every cryptocurrency that was made before cbdc that will be considered illegal and targeted, so we're fine :(

Anonymous

A lot of people seem to be worried about "with no bank options how can money get into/out of Bitcoin?" The funny things is, we don't actually need banks - that's the whole point of Bitcoin. Once we start actually using it like a currency value will flow in to it quite fast. IE: Billionaire wants $200 million in Bitcoin - they buy $200 million office building with fiat, they then exchange that office building with a Bitcoin whale that wants to convert $200 million of bitcoin (5700ish) they bought for $100 million into fiat or tangible assets like real estate. Boom $100 million in extra value enters Bitcoin ecosystem. This concept can scale down to even the level of someone wants to buy a TV with Bitcoin and another wanting to buy a TV worth of Bitcoin with fiat. All we need is to improve the mediums for people to conduct these types of direct exchanges. Let's not forget that most of all Bitcoin that will ever be in existence is already in the hands of people and can be freely exchanged. Cash does not need to be "put into" Bitcoin for it to exist or expand it's supply. We need to change this mindset of needing to "buy" Bitcoin and getting into the same one when you need money. When you need money you don't go to the bank to "buy" cash, you work at a job or sell stuff to get money. Should be the same to get Bitcoin.

Anonymous

How conveniently orchestrated.

Anonymous

Not surprised, still bothered.

Anonymous

This action may violate the APA. An agency cannot make substantive law by prohibiting lawful behavior, circumventing Congress.

Anonymous

So which is it ?? "But an FDIC spokesperson told Reuters after publication that the agency would not require divestment of crypto activities as part of any sale, and pointed to prior comments from FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg that the agency is not looking to prohibit any particular activity by banks."

Anonymous

So the state tells a private business what it can and cannot sell. Interesting!!

Anonymous

James please do video on how we onboard funds in decentralized crypto exchanges after choke point is successful. Or do we need to onboard those funds now? Worried if we go digital dollar it will not allow us to spend in that asset class.

Anonymous

Wen Binance bank?

Anonymous

"The two sources added that any buyer of Signature must agree to give up all the crypto business at the bank." Sounds like FUD to me. They can't legally tell buyers they have to give up the crypto businesses. I don't believe these "two sources," lol.

Anonymous

I wonder why all these crypto exchanges can’t come together or on their own and open private banks that serves only crypto and apply standards in these banks that all in crypto want to see in traditional finance!

Anonymous

Could TSLA be part of OC (Operation Chokepoint) agenda? Musk has been in their sights since his Twitter spilled the beans! 2022 takedown of TSLA was too much of a coincidence?