Home
Artists
Search Recent Random
Posts
Search DMs Popular Hash Lookup Tags Random
Importer
Import FAQ
Register
Partychan Telegram Find&Fuck Waifus ThePornDude
Home Artists Posts Import Register

Elaine Art! Bonus content for the month part 1! (Patreon)

Published:
2022-03-27 01:35:06
Imported:
2022-05

Content

Not much to say besides Elaine art really. I've got some nice artwork for upcoming story points

Files

Comments

Anonymous

Not gonna lie the eyes are tad to big, rest is good though

Anonymous

Great boobies

TroubleFait

She looks so happy. I guess it isn't humans she's shooting at 😄

The 49th Khan

Dear lord those eyes look like they came out of a late 90's shoujo manga.

David Brims
>>80628953

Yes? To be fair it would be harder to do the graphics for the lights in her eyes if you did them smaller.

Aaron Hardin

I notice all of the art of Elaine includes hair. We all know she usually has none, where is that art at.

ShotoGun

Why does she have boob armor when it’s been explicitly mentioned she doesn’t? Such armor would cave her chest in and prevent her from healing.

Amit Gupta
>>80630757

Ooh, that is a very astute observation. This blatant discrimination must end!

Markus
>>80628953

I think this comment was mainly related to the shape of the eyebrows and eyelashes.

Anonymous
>>80635686

I don't think it was ever a thing. The few times women wore armor in history, they were given standard male armor. If female soldiers were more commonplace, boob armor might've developed, more for fashion than functionality. But that's a moot point here, with Remus being the way it is.

mike
>>80635686

Yeah, the existence of codpieces on armor for male knights and kings suggests that if female knights/warriors had been common some form of boob armor would have arisen as well to be worn by the more prominent among them. Look up King Henry VIII's armor to see what I mean. I'll also add that the armor the female Mandalorians wear in the Star Wars show is a good example of how a practical set of armor can maintain hints of femininity without being absurd.

ShotoGun
>>80635686

Cod pieces exist to protect genitalia and work just fine for women too. Gorgets exist for both genders also.

mike
>>80635686

While it's true that cod pieces offered protection it is very clear and obvious that some were purposefully exaggerated purely for cosmetic reasons, even before accounting for the fact that there were other arguably better armor designs for serving the same purpose. There was even clothing made for and worn among the upper class at the time that mimicked codpieces purely for the purpose of fashion.

Veraenderer
>>80635686

Muscle armor was a thing so Boob armor would have probably been a thing, if enough female generals/warriors would have existed.

Anonymous

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6KHz0qWQA9I it actually isnt as impractical as people make it out to be